Skip to main content

Security report for bitgo.com

BitGo · Finance · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BitGo is a leading digital asset infrastructure company specializing in secure custody, staking, trading, and stablecoin services for institutional clients and platforms. Established in 2001, BitGo has positioned itself as a trusted provider in the digital asset economy, offering a comprehensive suite of financial services tailored to the evolving needs of the crypto market. Their business model focuses on B2B services, targeting institutions requiring robust security and compliance in digital asset management. Technically, BitGo employs a modern and secure infrastructure leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, Amazon Registrar for domain management, and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. The website demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, BitGo enforces HTTPS, implements strong security headers, and maintains certifications such as SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. The presence of detailed security policies and incident response contacts indicates a proactive security posture. No significant vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected, and privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, BitGo presents a high level of business credibility, technical sophistication, and security maturity. The website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with relevant regulations, making it a reliable platform for institutional digital asset services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitgo.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bitgo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
24,255
Employees
0
Customers
24,255
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

19 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bitgo.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BitGo operates in the finance sector, focusing on digital asset custody and related financial services. Its market positioning as a leader in digital asset infrastructure is supported by a broad portfolio of services including qualified custody, staking, trading, and stablecoins. The company targets institutional clients and platforms, leveraging certifications and compliance to build trust. Revenue streams likely include custody fees, staking services, trading facilitation, and stablecoin issuance. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major platforms and use of industry-standard marketing and analytics tools. Growth indicators include a long domain history and consistent branding. Strategic observations highlight BitGo's emphasis on security, compliance, and comprehensive service offerings to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

BitGo demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and industry-recognized certifications such as SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. The website uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms and provides clear incident response contacts. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved to enhance DNS security. The absence of a security.txt file is noted as a minor gap in vulnerability disclosure practices. Overall, BitGo's security practices effectively mitigate common risks and support its role as a trusted custodian of digital assets.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing detailed data retention policies related to analytics and tracking.
  5. Maintain continuous monitoring and update security certifications to uphold trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BitGo
Description
Accelerating the transition of the financial system to the digital asset economy with best-in-class custody, staking, trading, stablecoins, and everything in between.
Key services
Qualified Custody, Self-Custody, Trading, Financing, Collateral Management, Wealth Management, Settlement, Staking Services, Token Management, Stablecoin-as-a-Service
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Marketo Forms, OneTrust Cookie Consent, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Custom JavaScript modules
Platforms
Cloudflare, Amazon Registrar
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
Marketo Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  4. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools with transparency.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-standing business presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is robust, utilizing Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, ensuring fast and reliable content delivery. The technology stack includes modern JavaScript modules, integration with marketing automation (Marketo), and comprehensive analytics via Google Tag Manager. The site is custom-built without reliance on common CMS platforms, indicating tailored development. Performance is optimized with deferred JavaScript loading and preloading of fonts. Accessibility and SEO best practices are implemented, contributing to a positive user experience. Technical risks are minimal, with recommendations focusing on DNS security enhancements and vulnerability disclosure improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitgo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitgo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.