Skip to main content

Security report for bitget.com

Bitget · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bitget is a prominent cryptocurrency exchange and Web3 company offering services to buy, sell, hold, and earn cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and over 500 altcoins. The platform targets crypto traders and investors globally, positioning itself as a leading player in the crypto exchange market. The website demonstrates a professional design with multi-language support and modern technical infrastructure based on React and security best practices such as Trusted Types API usage. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data and lack of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies slightly diminish trust and compliance posture. Security measures are robust with HTTPS and script integrity, but additional security headers and incident response information would enhance the security maturity. Overall, Bitget presents a credible and technically sound platform with room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitget.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bitget.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
143,155
Employees
0
Customers
143,103
Third parties
52
Weak passwords
5%

106 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bitget.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bitget operates in the finance sector as a cryptocurrency exchange platform, generating revenue primarily through trading fees and related crypto services. The company leverages a modern web technology stack and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager. Its multi-domain presence including bitgetapp.com and bitget.site suggests a broad ecosystem supporting mobile and regional access. The business model focuses on providing a comprehensive crypto trading experience with a wide range of supported assets. Strategic partnerships and integrations with major platforms like Google and Telegram enhance its market reach. The lack of explicit company registration details and WHOIS transparency calls for further due diligence for business verification.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses advanced browser security features like Trusted Types API to mitigate XSS risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that should be addressed. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The lack of visible incident response contacts and security policies reduces preparedness perception. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by adopting comprehensive security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure policies, and enhancing user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Provide visible contact information including security incident response and abuse contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Establish and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular audits to ensure compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bitget
Description
Bitget is a leading crypto exchange and Web3 company to buy, sell, hold and earn cryptocurrencies. It supports Bitcoin, Ethereum, over 500 altcoins.
Key services
crypto trading, buy and sell cryptocurrencies, holding cryptocurrencies, earning cryptocurrencies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React 18, JavaScript, Trusted Types API, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Trusted Types API usage for XSS protection
  • Content Security Policy implied by script loading from trusted domains

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content
  4. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and security APIs
  5. Good SEO metadata and multi-language support indicated by hreflang links
  6. No visible forms or data collection fields in the provided HTML snippet
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information detected
  8. No explicit certifications or compliance badges visible
  9. Website content is focused on cryptocurrency trading and exchange services
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React 18, leveraging modern JavaScript and security APIs such as Trusted Types. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integrations. The site is multi-lingual with hreflang tags indicating global targeting. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, but could benefit from further optimization. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not explicit. The technical implementation is modern and aligns with industry standards, though improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low22 findingsView report
  2. 79/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitget.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitget.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.