Skip to main content

Security report for bitcoincasinokings.com

Bitcoin Casino Kings · Finance · N/A

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bitcoin Casino Kings is a specialized online platform providing comprehensive and unbiased reviews of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency casinos. Established in 2015, it has positioned itself as a trusted guide for crypto gambling enthusiasts by offering detailed insights into casino bonuses, game selections, and industry news. The platform targets cryptocurrency users interested in online gambling, emphasizing transparency and personal experience in its content. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a robust tech stack including Cloudflare for hosting and security, and integrates various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Hotjar. While the SSL certificate is valid, the site lacks support for modern TLS protocols and could improve its security posture by enabling HSTS and publishing dedicated security policies. The site demonstrates good privacy compliance with clear cookie and privacy policies, including consent mechanisms. Overall, Bitcoin Casino Kings exhibits a high level of professionalism, content quality, and user experience, making it a reliable resource in the crypto gambling niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitcoincasinokings.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates primarily as an affiliate marketing and content publishing business, generating revenue through partnerships with Bitcoin casinos. Its competitive advantage lies in its detailed, experience-based reviews and exclusive bonus offerings, which cater to a niche audience of crypto gamblers. The business model focuses on providing value through education, up-to-date news, and curated lists of trustworthy casinos, enhancing user trust and engagement. The presence of social media channels and a newsletter subscription indicates an active marketing strategy aimed at community building and customer retention. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a lean operational structure focused on digital interactions. The platform's consistent branding and comprehensive content reflect a mature digital presence with potential for growth in the expanding crypto gambling market.

Security posture

Bitcoin Casino Kings maintains a moderate security maturity level with a valid SSL certificate and implementation of essential security headers like X-Content-Type-Options. However, the lack of modern TLS protocol support (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and absence of HSTS reduce its overall security robustness. No explicit security policies or incident response procedures are published, which could impact user confidence in handling security incidents. The site does not have a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure program, limiting transparency in security practices. Despite these gaps, the site avoids known SSL/TLS vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed and POODLE. To enhance its security posture, the platform should adopt current best practices, including enabling strong TLS versions, enforcing HSTS, and providing clear security and incident response information. These improvements would align the site with industry standards and regulatory expectations, particularly in the finance and gambling sectors.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to strengthen SSL security.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing direct contact channels for security and support inquiries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Genesis Framework, leveraging a variety of JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Easy Table of Contents for enhanced user experience. Hosting is provided via Cloudflare, offering CDN and security features. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and AWeber for email marketing. Performance is optimized with caching mechanisms and lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are well implemented, contributing to excellent design and navigation clarity. However, the absence of modern TLS protocols and lack of DNSSEC or CAA records indicate areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience but requires updates to meet current security standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitcoincasinokings.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitcoincasinokings.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.