Skip to main content

Security report for bistro.lv

Bistro SILVA · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bistro SILVA is a small hospitality business based in Latvia offering a range of services including bistro dining, confectionery, tea house experiences, room rental, and banquet hosting. The website is professionally designed and hosted on WordPress.com, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with modern technologies such as Gutenberg and Jetpack plugins. The site is mobile optimized and provides clear navigation to its various service sections and partner sites. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy assessment, but the site appears legitimate based on content and hosting. Overall, the site is functional and suitable for its hospitality business purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bistro.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets local customers interested in dining and event services, leveraging a diversified hospitality model that includes food, beverage, and venue rental. The website links to partner hospitality domains, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The business model is service-oriented with direct customer engagement through physical locations and events. The site content and branding are consistent, supporting a moderate market position in the local hospitality sector. Growth potential could be enhanced by improving digital presence and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and is hosted on a reputable platform (WordPress.com), which provides baseline security. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of privacy and cookie policies indicate gaps in security and compliance maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting readiness for security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bistro SILVA
Description
Bistro SILVA is a hospitality business offering bistro dining, confectionery, tea house, room rental, and banquet services. The website showcases various sections for these services and links to related partner sites.
Key services
Bistro dining, Confectionery, Tea house, Room rental, Banquets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gutenberg, Jetpack, Twemoji, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
wordpress.com pixel
Marketing tools
WordPress.com Action Bar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted hospitality site with multiple service sections.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the site.
  5. Site uses HTTPS and WordPress.com infrastructure.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  8. External links mostly to related hospitality partner sites and WordPress services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Gutenberg blocks and Jetpack integration, hosted on WordPress.com infrastructure. It uses modern web fonts and emoji support scripts, ensuring a contemporary user experience. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and Open Graph data present. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations such as security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small hospitality business but has room for improvement in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bistro.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bistro.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.