Skip to main content

Security report for bioveta.cz

Bioveta, a.s. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bioveta, a.s. is a modern pharmaceutical company specializing in the production of veterinary and human medicines with a global presence, exporting to over 90 countries. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with multilingual support and active social media engagement. The business targets veterinary professionals, farmers, and distributors, offering a broad catalog of veterinary pharmaceuticals and related services. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK, and is built on the WebRedakce CMS platform. It demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The security posture is moderate with a well-implemented cookie consent mechanism and no visible vulnerabilities in the HTML content. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, which is a concern for trust assessment. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and compliant with GDPR cookie consent requirements but could improve in security transparency and domain registration clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bioveta.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bioveta holds a strong market position as a large-scale manufacturer and exporter of veterinary pharmaceuticals. Its business model focuses on production, distribution, and partner support, including a loyalty program. The company leverages multilingual websites to serve diverse markets across Europe and beyond. The presence of professional content, active social media channels, and participation in veterinary congresses indicates a well-established brand with growth orientation. The lack of visible certifications or detailed business registrations on the site suggests room for enhanced trust signals. The company appears to maintain partnerships with web service providers like NETservis s.r.o. for CMS and web hosting. Overall, Bioveta demonstrates a solid business foundation with opportunities to strengthen transparency and digital trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner with granular user controls, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no HTTP security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS) were detected in the HTML source, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting clear incident response channels. The WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant gap in domain trust verification. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The site uses third-party analytics and social media scripts, which require ongoing monitoring for security risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and verifying domain registration details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and privacy policy pages detailing data protection practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Establish and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and maintain GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bioveta, a.s.
Description
Bioveta je moderní farmaceutickou společností s celosvětovým působením vyrábějící léčiva pro veterinární i humánní použití.
Key services
výroba veterinárních léčiv, výroba humánních léčiv, podpora partnerů, věrnostní program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user controls.
  3. Multiple language versions available indicating international presence.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed.
  7. Social media presence active on Facebook and Instagram.
  8. No visible contact emails on main page; contact via contact page or social media.
  9. No terms of service page found.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a traditional CMS platform (WebRedakce by NETservis s.r.o.) and employs common web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK. The site is multilingual with language-specific subdomains or directories, indicating a mature internationalization strategy. Performance is moderate with a slideshow and embedded video content, which may impact load times but enhances user engagement. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and viewport meta tags. SEO is supported by meta keywords, descriptions, and structured navigation. However, the absence of advanced security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. The site could benefit from modernizing security configurations and improving domain registration transparency to reduce potential operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bioveta.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bioveta.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.