BioVendor Group · Healthcare · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.
BioVendor Group is a medium-sized healthcare and technology company specializing in the development, production, and distribution of innovative diagnostic products and technologies for laboratory diagnostics. The company positions itself as a technological leader with multiple brands and a strong focus on research and innovation. Their target audience includes physicians, patients, diagnostic laboratories, and the scientific community worldwide. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content about their key projects and services. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel, uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, and is optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices. The site is served over HTTPS with no visible security vulnerabilities in the content. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms, indicating a good level of privacy compliance. However, no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. From a security perspective, the website demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent but lacks published security policies and incident response information. The WHOIS data is malformed and incomplete, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Despite this, the professional website content and branding mitigate some concerns. No adult or questionable content is present, making the site safe for general audiences. Overall, the website is well-designed, functional, and professional with moderate technical maturity and good privacy compliance. The main risk lies in the incomplete WHOIS data, which should be monitored. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies, improving accessibility, and enhancing security headers to strengthen the security posture and trustworthiness.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint
What to do: Consider restricting access to RPC or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention biovendor.group, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for biovendor.group right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with biovendor.group. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biovendor.group.