Skip to main content

Security report for biomet.com

Zimmer Biomet · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zimmer Biomet is a global leader in orthopedic medical technology, providing innovative implants and digital solutions across the patient journey. The company targets healthcare professionals and patients, offering a comprehensive portfolio of products and services that position it strongly in the healthcare sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive use of modern marketing and analytics technologies such as Adobe Experience Manager, Marketo, and Drift chatbot. Privacy and cookie compliance are well implemented, including GDPR adherence and user consent mechanisms. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a large enterprise and may indicate privacy protection or registry issues, warranting further monitoring. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biomet.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention biomet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
258
Employees
3
Customers
60
Third parties
195
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-05-17 · 11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for biomet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –webmail.biomet.com2026-05-17
  • –recall.biomet.com2025-09-20
  • –webmail.biomet.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate biomet.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
58
Registered
58
Resolving
58
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-07-08

Masked preview

  • bi••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • ji••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • bi••••.comMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of biomet.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zimmer Biomet operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on orthopedic implants and digital healthcare technologies. The company maintains a strong global market position as a medical technology leader. Its business model centers on manufacturing and delivering innovative medical devices and digital solutions to healthcare providers and patients. The website's integration with marketing and analytics platforms indicates a sophisticated approach to customer engagement and lead generation. Social media integration and comprehensive privacy policies enhance credibility. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the company's established market presence. No direct evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found in the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of multiple security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of cookie consent banners and compliance with GDPR indicate attention to privacy regulations. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. The inclusion of third-party marketing and analytics scripts introduces potential risk vectors that should be regularly audited. No known vulnerabilities or security incidents were detected from the content analysis. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could be improved with more explicit security governance disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer or security team to enhance trust and compliance.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and marketing tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance documentation of certifications and compliance frameworks to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zimmer Biomet
Description
Zimmer Biomet is a global medical technology leader offering innovative implants and digital technologies across all stages of the patient journey.
Key services
Orthopedic implants, Digital healthcare technologies, Patient journey solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager, VideoJS, Google Maps API, Marketo, OneTrust, Adobe DTM (Dynamic Tag Management), Drift Chatbot
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin, ShareThis
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM, Marketo, Drift Chatbot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security or vulnerability disclosures.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a large corporate domain.
  6. Content is healthcare focused and safe for general audiences.
  7. Social media presence is well linked and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies including VideoJS for media, Google Maps API, and marketing automation tools like Marketo and Drift chatbot. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of multiple third-party scripts. Security headers and HTTPS configuration are well implemented. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for a global enterprise. Opportunities exist to improve performance optimization and reduce technical debt by streamlining third-party integrations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biomet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biomet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.