Skip to main content

Security report for bioindustry.org

BioIndustry Association · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The BioIndustry Association (BIA) serves as the leading voice for the UK's innovative life sciences and biotech sector, representing over 600 member companies. The organization focuses on policy advocacy, sector growth, networking, and providing resources to support biotech companies and stakeholders. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, showcasing their role in shaping UK biotech leadership globally. Technically, the site employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates advanced analytics and consent management tools like Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses multiple security headers, and manages cookie consent effectively, though it lacks explicit public-facing security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website is well-designed, accessible, and compliant with privacy regulations, but the absence of WHOIS data and direct contact information slightly reduces trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bioindustry.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
34
Security headers
55
Email security
90
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bioindustry.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
8%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bioindustry.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BIA operates as a membership association targeting biotech and life sciences companies in the UK, providing advocacy, networking, and sector development services. Their market position is strong as a central industry body with a broad membership base. The business model relies on membership fees and event sponsorships, with a focus on policy influence and sector promotion. The website's integration with partner domains such as Cytiva Life Sciences and C212 indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The absence of direct contact details suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, possibly via member portals. Growth indicators include active event hosting and policy engagement. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional content, reinforcing credibility within its niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure channels limits transparency and preparedness perception. The WHOIS data is incomplete, which may raise concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the site is secure for visitors but could improve by publishing explicit security and incident response documentation and providing direct security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process with clear contact information.
  3. Enhance visibility of company contact information to improve trust and user engagement.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure ongoing security and privacy compliance.
  5. Monitor and update WHOIS registration data to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BioIndustry Association
Description
The BioIndustry Association (BIA) is the voice of the innovative life sciences and biotech industry in the UK, driving innovation, shaping policy, and showcasing UK biotech leadership globally. It connects founders, scale-ups, and investors, delivering insight and advocacy.
Key services
Policy influence, Member networking and community, Events hosting and sponsorship, Sector growth support, Resources and insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Owl Carousel, Preside CMS extensions
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cision, Cloudflare, Cookiebot, Issuu, LinkedIn, YouTube, Twitter
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance via Cookiebot.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or malformed, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security or incident response contact information publicly available.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Preside CMS with Bootstrap for responsive design, integrating Google Fonts for typography and Owl Carousel for interactive sliders. Analytics and user behavior tracking are implemented using Google Analytics and Hotjar, while Cookiebot manages cookie consent and compliance. The site loads multimedia content such as videos and images efficiently, with mobile optimization and accessibility features in place. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times and script optimization. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience and compliance with privacy regulations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bioindustry.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bioindustry.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.