Skip to main content

Security report for bigshock.cz

Big Shock s.r.o. · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Big Shock s.r.o. operates the official website for the Big Shock energy drink brand, offering a range of energy beverages, ice teas, coffees, energy bars, sugars, and branded merchandise. The site targets consumers primarily in the Czech Republic and serves as an e-commerce platform with promotional content and social media integration. The company positions itself as a prominent player in the energy drink market with a strong brand presence and active marketing campaigns. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot for cookie consent, OneSignal for push notifications, and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses HTTPS with appropriate security headers, indicating a good level of digital maturity. However, some accessibility features and explicit privacy policy documentation are lacking. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement, use of security headers, and bot mitigation. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a dedicated privacy policy and contact information for security or incident response reduces compliance maturity. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trust but is common for commercial brands. Overall, the website is professionally designed, secure, and functional for its business purpose. Strategic improvements in privacy documentation, contact transparency, and accessibility would enhance compliance and user trust. The risk profile is moderate with no immediate security concerns but room for governance enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigshock.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bigshock.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,207
Employees
0
Customers
5,207
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bigshock.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Big Shock s.r.o. operates in the energy sector with a focus on retailing energy drinks and related products through an e-commerce model. The company leverages digital marketing, social media, and promotions to engage a young, active consumer base. Its competitive advantage lies in brand recognition and diversified product offerings including ice teas, coffees, and energy bars. Revenue streams are primarily from direct online sales and merchandise. The company maintains a strong presence on Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, indicating a strategy focused on social engagement and influencer marketing. Growth indicators include active contests and new product launches. The partnership ecosystem includes marketing and analytics service providers but no direct partner domains were identified. Operationally, the company appears medium-sized with a regional focus in the Czech Republic.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, reducing risks of common web attacks. The use of reCAPTCHA and cookie consent mechanisms further enhance protection against automated abuse and ensure some level of privacy compliance. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks full documentation. The security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and public security contacts to improve trust and incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Provide clear contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Big Shock s.r.o.
Description
Oficiální stránky toho nejlepšího energeťáku. Soutěž s náma o super ceny, mrkni na naše příchutě, přečti si blog a čekni merch v e-shopu.
Key services
Energy drinks sales, Ice tea and coffee beverage sales, Energy bars and sugar products, Merchandise sales, Promotions and contests
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, OneSignal, reCAPTCHA, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Tailwind CSS (inferred from class names), JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ecomail
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, OneSignal
Marketing tools
Ecomail
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a commercial e-commerce platform for Big Shock energy drinks and related products.
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting Czech market.
  3. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or registry issues.
  4. Site uses modern tracking and marketing technologies with cookie consent.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  7. Social media presence is strong with Instagram, YouTube, TikTok links.
  8. Site is HTTPS secured with good security headers.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks and libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components, Google Tag Manager for analytics management, and Cookiebot for cookie compliance. The CSS suggests use of utility-first frameworks like Tailwind CSS. Performance is moderate with responsive design optimized for mobile devices. The site uses multiple external scripts for marketing and tracking, which should be monitored for security and privacy compliance. No CMS was explicitly detected, indicating a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not disclosed. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party services and incomplete privacy documentation, which could impact compliance and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigshock.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigshock.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.