Skip to main content

Security report for bigbadbagels.lv

Big Bad Bagels · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Big Bad Bagels is a small local food retail business based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in freshly baked bagels with high-quality ingredients. Established in 2015, it operates two physical locations and offers catering and franchising services. The website reflects a focused business model targeting local customers and visitors seeking authentic bagel experiences. Technically, the website uses a Mozello CMS platform with common web technologies such as jQuery, Fancybox, and Google Analytics, hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and protection. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigbadbagels.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a pioneering position in Latvia's bagel market, emphasizing artisanal baking traditions and local presence. Revenue streams likely include in-store sales, catering, and franchising. The target audience is local residents and tourists in Riga. The business maintains active social media channels to engage customers. The website content and structure support a straightforward retail and hospitality business model with no complex e-commerce or subscription services. Growth potential exists through franchising and catering expansion. The absence of detailed corporate registration data limits deeper business verification.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, posing legal risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the security maturity is basic and should be enhanced to protect customer data and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Create a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Big Bad Bagels
Description
Bagel shop in Riga. Freshly baked bagels daily with high quality ingredients. Trailblazers of bagel making in Latvia since April 2015. Two locations in Riga with detailed working hours and contact info.
Key services
Fresh bagels baked daily, Catering, Franchising opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox3, Google Analytics, Google Fonts (Roboto, Exo 2), Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers, emails, and physical addresses.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  6. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. Content is focused on local food retail business with good quality and relevant information.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; limits domain trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard CMS (Mozello) with common JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and fonts. Hosting via Amazon Cloudfront CDN supports performance and availability. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML. However, no advanced frameworks or platforms were detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The lack of security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business website but requires modernization for enhanced security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigbadbagels.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigbadbagels.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.