Skip to main content

Security report for biedribasnams.lv

SIA "Liepājas latviešu biedrības nams" · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liepājas Latviešu biedrības nams is a small-sized cultural center and event venue located in Liepāja, Latvia. The organization offers venue rental services including a large hall, exhibition gallery, chamber hall, ballet hall, and concert garden, catering to local cultural events and community activities. The website reflects a well-established local cultural institution with a clear focus on serving the community and event organizers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel. It employs Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a clear navigation structure, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, suitable for the site's content and audience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, it lacks advanced security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure policy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for a local cultural organization with moderate technical maturity and a good privacy posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility could enhance its security and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biedribasnams.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates primarily in the hospitality and non-profit sectors, focusing on cultural event hosting and venue rental. Its market position is local and community-oriented, supported by partnerships with local government and cultural institutions. The business model relies on renting spaces for events and exhibitions, supplemented by inventory rental services. The website content and partner affiliations suggest stable local recognition and a trusted reputation. Revenue streams likely include venue rental fees and event hosting charges. The partnership ecosystem includes municipal and cultural bodies, enhancing credibility and outreach. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of multiple event listings and galleries suggests active engagement. The website development partner is credited, indicating professional digital support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The use of WordPress and common libraries necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small cultural organization but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Publish incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Liepājas latviešu biedrības nams"
Registration number
42103027783
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Liepājas latviešu biedrības nams"
Description
Liepājas Latviešu biedrības nams ir daudzfunkcionāls kultūras centrs un nozīmīga vēsturisku un kultūras notikumu norises vieta Liepājas centrā - Rožu laukumā.
Key services
Venue rental (large hall, exhibition gallery, chamber hall, ballet hall, concert garden), Event hosting and organization, Inventory rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based cultural center site with event and venue rental information.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and good SEO metadata.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with user consent mechanism.
  4. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  8. Partner logos indicate local government and cultural institution support.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a frontend leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Slick Carousel for image sliders. Font Awesome provides iconography. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking and analytics. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from both local and CDN sources. Performance is moderate with no major blocking issues detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive navigation and layout. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small cultural organization website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biedribasnams.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biedribasnams.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.