Skip to main content

Security report for biconomy.com

Biconomy · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biconomy operates as a large-scale cryptocurrency exchange platform offering a wide range of services including spot trading, futures, earn products, and token launchpad. It targets a global audience of crypto traders and investors, boasting presence in over 180 countries and licensing in multiple jurisdictions. The platform emphasizes low fees, scalability, and a broad selection of cryptocurrencies. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks (likely Vue.js/Nuxt.js), Cloudflare CDN for performance and security, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Zendesk for analytics and customer support. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and a bug bounty program, though some privacy compliance aspects like cookie consent could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues, which slightly lowers trustworthiness. Overall, Biconomy presents as a professional and credible crypto exchange with room for enhanced transparency and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biconomy.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Biconomy positions itself among the top 20 cryptocurrency exchanges by volume, with a business model centered on providing diverse crypto trading and financial services. Its competitive advantages include a wide range of supported coins, licensing in key markets, and a comprehensive product suite. Revenue streams likely include trading fees, futures contracts, and token listing services. The company actively engages users via referral programs and maintains a strong social media presence. Strategic partnerships include bug bounty platforms and customer support integrations. Growth indicators include multi-language support and app availability on mobile platforms. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and physical address information suggests a need for greater transparency to strengthen market confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration with Cloudflare's CDN and WAF services. The presence of a bug bounty program indicates proactive vulnerability management. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response plan and lack of a security.txt file limits transparency. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no visible cookie consent mechanism. Incident response contact channels are not explicitly provided. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing detailed security and incident response documentation and improving privacy consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to enhance transparency.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Verify and publish domain registration details or clarify privacy protection to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biconomy
Description
Biconomy is a large cryptocurrency exchange serving millions of users in over 180 countries, offering trading of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and altcoins with low fees and high scalability.
Key services
Spot Trading, Futures, Earn, Kickstarter, Token Listing, Third-party payments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (implied by Nuxt.js usage), Google Tag Manager, Zendesk, Cloudflare (CDN and security)
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Platforms
Web, Mobile (Android/iOS apps)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare CDN and WAF
  • Bug bounty program
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Zendesk
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional cryptocurrency exchange platform with multi-language support.
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain, raising legitimacy questions.
  3. Privacy and terms policies are present and linked to Zendesk knowledge base.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner detected.
  5. Multiple social media and community links present.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CDN for performance and security.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Bug bounty program indicates proactive security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, likely Vue.js with Nuxt.js framework, and is hosted behind Cloudflare CDN providing performance optimization and security. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, and Zendesk is integrated for customer support. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and supports multiple languages. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts and stylesheets. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based solution. Technical risks include reliance on third-party services and incomplete privacy compliance. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and privacy features, and to ensure continuous monitoring of third-party library vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biconomy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biconomy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.