Skip to main content

Security report for bi.bi

Afriregister Domain Privacy · Media · Burundi

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BiBiPiano is a small independent classical piano artist website primarily targeting Chinese-speaking music enthusiasts interested in unconventional piano pieces. The site offers free downloads of high-quality music files and music sheets under a Creative Commons license, supported by a membership system for registered users. The business model focuses on direct content distribution and community engagement rather than commercial sales. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with standard plugins and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is mobile optimized with a moderate performance profile. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional for its niche but could enhance security and privacy practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bi.bi. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bi.bi

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a personal brand for a classical piano performer, leveraging free content distribution and community membership to engage fans. It occupies a niche market with limited direct competition, focusing on quality audio downloads and music sheets. The business model is non-commercial with Creative Commons licensing, appealing to enthusiasts and amateur musicians. The site links to mainstream platforms like Bilibili and YouTube for broader exposure. Growth potential lies in expanding membership features and content offerings. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is consistent with a small personal site. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The site maintains a consistent brand image and clear communication of licensing terms, fostering trust among its audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could expose the site to DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. No security.txt or incident response contacts are provided, limiting vulnerability disclosure readiness. The use of standard WordPress plugins requires ongoing patch management to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or signs of compromise were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small personal site but improvements are recommended to enhance resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to secure DNS resolution.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to latest versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Afriregister Domain Privacy
Description
BiBiPiano is a classical piano performer who enjoys playing unconventional pieces. The website offers free downloads of music works under CC BY-NC 4.0 license, including high-quality FLAC audio files and music sheets. The site targets music enthusiasts and fans interested in classical and non-classical piano music.
Key services
Free music downloads (FLAC format), Music sheet sharing, Membership area with downloads and profile management, Links to mainstream music platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Contact Form 7, Simple Membership Plugin, Auto Terms of Service and Privacy Policy Plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal artist site focused on piano music.
  2. Content is primarily in Simplified Chinese.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Privacy and terms pages are present but cookie consent is missing.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  8. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.5 with common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Simple Membership. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links present. The site lacks advanced frameworks but is well-structured for its purpose. Technical debt is low but security enhancements and privacy compliance improvements are needed to modernize the infrastructure and reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bi.bi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bi.bi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.