Better Day is a healthcare technology company specializing in providing an all-in-one medical management platform that includes electronic health records (EHR), practice management software, revenue cycle management, and specialty-specific consultations. The company targets healthcare providers, practice managers, and patients, aiming to simplify workflows and improve clinical and administrative efficiency. The website reflects a small-sized, niche provider with a consistent brand and good content quality, supported by customer testimonials and a recognized certification badge from the Drummond Group.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention betterdayhealth.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for betterdayhealth.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Better Day operates primarily in the healthcare sector, offering SaaS solutions tailored to medical practices. Their business model focuses on integrated software solutions that streamline clinical documentation, billing, and patient engagement. The presence of testimonials from a known orthopedic center indicates established partnerships and customer trust. The company appears to maintain a focused market position with specialty consultations as a differentiator. The domain age and registration details align with the company's claimed history, supporting credibility.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for enhancing domain and web application security. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating gaps in compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. The absence of vulnerability disclosure and incident response information suggests limited transparency in security practices. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended best practices.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
Provide direct contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Better Day
Description
Better Day provides EHR, practice software, and specialty specific consultations to simplify and improve workflows in healthcare practices.
Key services
Electronic Health Records (EHR), Practice Management Software, Revenue Cycle Management, Specialty Specific Consultations, Patient Portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Fusion Builder, CaptainForm plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Avada Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
ClientRenewProhibited domain status
ClientTransferProhibited domain status
ClientUpdateProhibited domain status
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Marketing tools
CaptainForm (form management)
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
Contact information is only available via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
Site uses modern WordPress theme and plugins with SEO optimization.
Security headers are not detected; DNSSEC is not enabled.
Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
Testimonials and certification badge provide trust signals.
External links mostly to partner healthcare site and service providers.
No visible email addresses or phone numbers for direct contact.
No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO and CaptainForm for forms. Hosting is provided by DreamHost, a reputable provider. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and privacy compliance improvements are needed to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with betterdayhealth.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review betterdayhealth.com.