The website bestlistofporn.com operates as an adult content aggregator, providing curated lists and links to various pornographic websites. Established in 2011, it targets adult users seeking free and premium porn content. The business model appears to be based on affiliate referrals and content aggregation within the adult media sector. The website uses WordPress as its CMS platform, enhanced with performance optimization via WP Rocket. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with moderate mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is weak, lacking essential security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement details. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no privacy or cookie policies detected. Contact and incident response information are absent, reducing business credibility and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or security challenges but requires significant improvements in security and compliance to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
49
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention bestlistofporn.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for bestlistofporn.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Bestlistofporn.com occupies a niche position in the adult media industry as a content aggregator and referral platform. Its longevity since 2011 suggests stable operation, though the lack of transparent business and contact information limits its credibility. The site likely generates revenue through affiliate marketing by directing traffic to partner porn sites. The target audience is adult consumers of online pornographic content. The absence of certifications, privacy policies, or security disclosures indicates a low maturity level in compliance and governance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The business operates primarily online with a small-scale footprint.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a low security maturity level. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL certificate details in the provided data, which is a critical security gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further exposes the site to compliance risks, especially under GDPR. No forms or user input fields were found, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts.
Recommendations
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
Provide clear contact information including business address, email, and phone for support and incident reporting.
Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security transparency and readiness.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
Website providing a curated list of pornographic websites and related adult content.
Key services
Porn site listings, Adult content aggregation, Affiliate referrals
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, WP Rocket (performance plugin)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
30/100
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website is an adult content aggregator with no visible privacy or cookie policies.
No contact information or security policies are published.
Technical implementation uses WordPress with performance optimization plugin WP Rocket.
No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected in provided content.
No forms or data collection fields detected in the provided HTML snippet.
No social media or company contact emails found.
Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress, utilizing standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It employs Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icons, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. The site shows moderate mobile optimization and basic SEO meta tags. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries were detected. Performance is moderate, with some optimization in place but potential for improvement. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or enhanced accessibility markup observed. The technical stack is typical for small to medium WordPress sites but lacks advanced security and compliance integrations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with bestlistofporn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bestlistofporn.com.