Skip to main content

Security report for bestfinance.lv

Best Finance · Finance · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Best Finance is a Latvian company specializing in vehicle leasing and financing services. The website offers a catalog of available cars, a leasing calculator tool, and contact options to facilitate customer engagement. The company targets Latvian consumers seeking flexible vehicle financing solutions. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and built on WordPress with modern front-end libraries, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of visible security headers and lack of WHOIS transparency slightly reduce trust. Overall, the site presents a legitimate and functional business presence in the Latvian finance and transportation sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bestfinance.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Best Finance operates as a small-sized finance intermediary focused on vehicle leasing and sales within Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing leasing options and vehicle inventory to local customers. The company leverages a user-friendly website with tools like a leasing calculator to enhance customer experience. The presence of privacy and cookie policies indicates awareness of regulatory compliance, though terms of service and security policies are missing. The company uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for marketing insights. The lack of WHOIS data limits full verification of legitimacy but the website content and contact details support a credible business operation. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, which are positive security practices. However, no HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The WordPress platform and plugins should be regularly updated to avoid known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy documentation is publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and proactive vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by including terms of service and data protection officer contact information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Best Finance
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Best Finance
Description
Best Finance is a Latvian company offering vehicle leasing and financing services, including a car catalog with available vehicles and a leasing calculator to assist customers in finding suitable financing options.
Key services
Vehicle leasing, Vehicle sales, Leasing application processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.1.3, Bootstrap-select, Slick Carousel, Fancybox, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, WordPress 5.2.21, WPML
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked.
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. No data protection officer contact found.
  9. Website content is focused on vehicle leasing and sales in Latvia.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.2.21 with WPML for multilingual support, using Bootstrap 4.1.3 and jQuery libraries for responsive design and interactivity. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links. No hosting provider information was identified from the HTML content. The site uses standard web technologies but lacks advanced security headers and some modern accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bestfinance.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bestfinance.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.