Skip to main content

Security report for beskidy.travel

Slaska Organizacja Turystyczna · Hospitality · Poland

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website beskidy.travel serves as a regional tourism portal for the Beskidy and Silesian Cieszyn regions in Poland, operated by the Slaska Organizacja Turystyczna. It provides comprehensive information on cultural heritage, tourist trails, events, accommodations, gastronomy, and multimedia content aimed at tourists and visitors interested in exploring the region. The business model focuses on regional tourism promotion and information dissemination, positioning itself as an important regional authority in hospitality and tourism sectors. Technically, the site employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain protections but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of a visible privacy policy, though cookie consent is implemented. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beskidy.travel

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Slaska Organizacja Turystyczna operates this medium-sized regional tourism website founded in 2016, targeting tourists interested in the Beskidy and Silesian Cieszyn areas. The site offers a rich ecosystem of services including route guides, event listings, accommodation and gastronomy information, and multimedia galleries. It leverages partnerships with related regional domains such as slaskie.travel and silesia.travel, indicating a collaborative regional tourism network. The business model is informational and promotional, likely funded by regional government or tourism boards. The website's consistent branding and use of official verification signals enhance its credibility. However, the lack of direct contact information and privacy policy may limit user trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain registration protections that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, it lacks DNSSEC, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended best practices. The site uses third-party analytics tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar, which require careful privacy management. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incidents.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Slaska Organizacja Turystyczna
Description
Tourism promotion website for the Beskidy and Silesian Cieszyn region, providing information on cultural heritage, tourist trails, events, accommodations, gastronomy, and multimedia related to the region.
Key services
Tourist information, Event listings, Route and trail guides, Accommodation and gastronomy listings, Multimedia galleries and virtual tours
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome 5.9.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Hotjar, Weatherwidget.io, Select2, Tempus Dominus Bootstrap 4, Slick Carousel, Social Share Kit, jQuery UI, Zabuto Calendar
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited
  • No DNSSEC enabled (not ideal but common)
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional tourism portal for Beskidy and Silesian Cieszyn region in Poland.
  2. Content is rich with multiple categories including cultural heritage, active tourism, events, multimedia, and practical information.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking tools (Google Analytics, Hotjar).
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  10. Website uses modern frontend technologies and is mobile optimized.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The CMS appears to be SonataCore or a similar Symfony-based system. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as font size adjustment and color inversion. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beskidy.travel. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beskidy.travel.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.