Skip to main content

Security report for berumielasts.com

Bēru mielasti un banketi · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.berumielasts.com represents a small local business specializing in funeral meal organization and banquet hosting services in Riga, Latvia. The business offers catering with diverse menu options, venue rental for up to 120 persons, and free parking near Meža kapi cemetery. The website is built on the Wix platform and uses standard Wix technologies along with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Sentry for monitoring. The technical infrastructure is moderate in performance and mobile optimized, but lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and some security hardening scripts, but lacks explicit security headers and formal policies. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness and suggests the domain may be newly registered or privacy protected without clear justification. Contact information is limited to a phone number and physical address, with no email or contact forms found. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is functional and professional for its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced transparency, security policies, and WHOIS data clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching berumielasts.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector focusing on funeral-related catering and banquet services. It targets local customers in Riga seeking organized funeral meals and related events. The business model is service-oriented with revenue likely from event hosting and catering fees. The website content and structured data provide clear business information, but lack detailed corporate data such as founding year or parent company. The market position is local and niche, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The presence of social media meta tags suggests some digital marketing efforts. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of security scripts to harden fetch and XMLHttpRequest calls. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or security policies published. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels increases the need for clear user consent mechanisms, which are absent. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including a company email and incident response contacts.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user consent.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bēru mielasti un banketi
Description
Bēru mielastu organizēšana un apkalpošana , daudzveidīga ēdienkaršu izvēle , telpas līdz 120 personām , pieejamas trīs banketu zāles, bez maksas automašīnu novietošana ,atrodamies netālu no Meža kapiem.Поминки, поминальный обед​.
Key services
Funeral meal organization, Banquet hosting, Catering with diverse menu options, Venue rental for up to 120 persons, Free parking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Sentry (error monitoring)
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security override scripts to harden fetch and XHR

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found or linked.
  3. Contact info limited to phone and physical address; no email contact found.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media presence indicated by Facebook admin meta tag but no direct social links found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. Website content is in Latvian with some Russian keywords, targeting local audience.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's content delivery and hosting infrastructure. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Sentry for error monitoring. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance is moderate, with some polyfills and legacy support scripts included. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but lacks advanced optimization. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The technical stack is typical for small business Wix sites, with opportunities for modernization by reducing third-party dependencies and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with berumielasts.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review berumielasts.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.