Skip to main content

Security report for bernucentr.lv

Sabiedriskais fonds Rehabilitācijas centrs «Svētā Sofija» · Healthcare · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bernucentr.lv represents a non-profit rehabilitation center named Sabiedriskais fonds Rehabilitācijas centrs «Svētā Sofija», focused on providing rehabilitation services primarily for children with developmental challenges and adults recovering from serious health events such as strokes and heart attacks. The center emphasizes a caring, home-like atmosphere with professional specialists and modern equipment. The site is multilingual, targeting Russian, Latvian, Greek, and English-speaking audiences, reflecting a regional focus in Latvia. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and includes SEO and slider plugins, with embedded YouTube content and Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and a privacy policy page, which impacts compliance and trust. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professionally designed and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bernucentr.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The center operates as a specialized healthcare non-profit entity serving children with cerebral palsy, autism, and other developmental disorders, as well as adults needing rehabilitation post-cardiovascular incidents. Its business model is service-oriented, likely funded by donations, grants, or government support, with a focus on social impact rather than commercial profit. The presence of partner domains suggests collaboration within a healthcare and social services ecosystem. The multilingual approach and detailed service descriptions indicate an intent to reach a broad regional audience. The website's content quality and structure support its credibility, though the absence of explicit contact details and privacy documentation may limit user trust and engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense against common web attacks like clickjacking and protocol downgrade attacks. The use of WordPress and popular plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and incident response readiness. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some compliance with privacy regulations, but the lack of a privacy policy page and detailed GDPR compliance information is a gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to enhance web security.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and a vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident management.
  4. Add clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sabiedriskais fonds Rehabilitācijas centrs «Svētā Sofija»
Description
Детский реабилитационный центр с уютной домашней атмосферой, отзывчивым персоналом, высококлассными специалистами и современным инновационным оборудованием. Центр помогает детям с особенностями развития социализироваться и стать полноправными членами общества.
Key services
Детская реабилитация (ДЦП, Алалия, Аутизм), Реабилитация взрослых после инфаркта и инсульта, Психологическая поддержка, ABA терапия, Туалетный тренинг
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, LayerSlider plugin, Google Analytics, YouTube iframe API
Frameworks
Avada theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress environment)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is multilingual with Russian, Latvian, Greek, and English versions.
  2. Content is focused on rehabilitation services for children and adults.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages clearly identified.
  6. Use of modern WordPress theme and plugins.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. Google Analytics and YouTube scripts are used for tracking and media embedding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, supported by plugins such as Yoast SEO and LayerSlider for enhanced SEO and visual presentation. The site loads embedded YouTube videos and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. CSS and JavaScript are minified and cached, indicating some performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and the site supports multiple languages. However, the lack of visible security headers and incomplete privacy documentation suggest technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for content delivery but requires enhancements in security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bernucentr.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bernucentr.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.