Berenberg · Finance · Germany
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.
Berenberg is a historic and well-established financial institution founded in 1590, headquartered in Hamburg, Germany, with a strong presence across Europe and the United States. The company offers a comprehensive suite of financial services including investment banking, corporate banking, asset management, and fund management. It is recognized as one of Europe's leading advisors with a large equity research team covering over 800 European companies. The website reflects a mature digital presence with detailed business information, multiple international office locations, and a focus on client service and sustainability. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript frameworks, SVG graphics, lazy loading, and structured data for SEO. Hosting is on Microsoft Azure with DNS managed by Colt, and the SSL configuration is robust with TLS 1.2 and strong cipher suites. Cookie consent is managed via CookieFirst, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and protocols, such as enabling HSTS, DNSSEC, and TLS 1.3. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices including SPF and DMARC email protections, OCSP stapling, and no detected SSL vulnerabilities. The privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages were found, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and security posture. Overall, Berenberg's website and digital infrastructure reflect a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness, supporting its position as a major player in the financial services sector. Strategic improvements in security protocols and transparency could further strengthen its risk management and client confidence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention berenberg.com, from OffSeq Breach.
1 subdomain affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for berenberg.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with berenberg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review berenberg.com.