Skip to main content

Security report for bepolite.eu

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Parik24' is an online platform specializing in boxing betting, targeting boxing fans primarily in Ukraine and internationally. It offers a variety of betting markets including live betting and detailed odds, positioning itself as a niche sports betting media site. The site is built on WordPress with common front-end libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. The design is professional and content is relevant and well-structured, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is limited with no visible security headers or privacy policies, and no contact information is provided, which may impact user trust and compliance with regulations. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bepolite.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Parik24 operates in the sports betting niche focusing exclusively on boxing, leveraging the popularity of Ukrainian and global boxing stars to attract bettors. The business model revolves around providing betting odds and markets, likely monetized through betting commissions or partnerships. The platform targets a specialized audience of boxing enthusiasts and bettors, offering live betting and diverse market options. The lack of visible contact or corporate information suggests a small-scale operation. The site uses a common WordPress theme and plugins, indicating a cost-effective digital infrastructure. No evident partnerships or certifications are displayed, which could be areas for growth to build trust and expand market presence.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of contact information for incident response or security inquiries further reduces readiness for handling security incidents. While HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), the lack of visible security best practices and vulnerability disclosures suggests the need for a comprehensive security review. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content, but the site should implement stronger security controls and transparency to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a security or abuse contact email to facilitate incident response.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and third-party scripts to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Parik24 is a platform offering official online boxing betting with advantageous odds, providing a wide range of markets, live predictions, and a user-friendly interface targeted at boxing fans.
Key services
boxing betting markets, live betting, betting analytics and odds, user-friendly betting interface
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, Yoast SEO plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Ukrainian language focused on boxing betting.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly provided.
  5. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  6. No explicit security headers or policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. No advertising or affiliate program disclosures found.
  9. Site branding is consistent with the boxing betting theme.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a custom or child theme 'newsgame' and 'morenews' theme assets. It employs front-end libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, and Magnific Popup for UI components and interactivity. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin, with well-structured metadata and JSON-LD schema for rich search results. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and deferred loading of some scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. However, the site lacks advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries, indicating a traditional web stack. There is no evidence of advanced hosting or CDN usage beyond the registrar information. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy technical implementations require improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bepolite.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bepolite.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.