Skip to main content

Security report for benefitplus.cz

BENEFIT plus CZ, s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BENEFIT plus CZ, s.r.o. is a Czech-based tax, accounting, and consulting firm established in 1997, serving a diverse client base from small entrepreneurs to larger companies and non-profit organizations. The company emphasizes professional insurance coverage and is led by a certified tax advisor who is a member of relevant professional bodies. The website reflects a modest but functional digital presence built on WordPress, with basic navigation and content relevant to its business domain. However, the technical stack is outdated, posing potential security risks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in compliance with modern data protection standards. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and updated software versions. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective but the website content and contact details appear consistent with a legitimate small business. Strategic improvements in security, compliance, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching benefitplus.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, focusing on tax advisory and accounting services primarily for Czech clients. Its market position is that of a small, regionally focused firm with a long operational history. The business model revolves around professional service delivery with insurance-backed liability coverage. The target audience includes entrepreneurs, SMEs, and non-profits. The website lacks advanced marketing or analytics tools, indicating a low digital marketing footprint. Partnerships with professional bodies add credibility. Growth potential may be limited by the current digital and security posture, suggesting opportunities for modernization and enhanced online presence.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. HTTPS is implemented, but the site uses outdated WordPress and jQuery versions, exposing it to known vulnerabilities. No advanced security headers are detected, and there is no evidence of a formal security policy or incident response mechanism. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics that could raise privacy concerns. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to meet current standards and protect client data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to the latest secure versions immediately.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  4. Establish an incident response plan and provide clear security contact information on the website.
  5. Modernize the website's technical stack and improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BENEFIT plus CZ, s.r.o.
Registration number
29142 (OR KOS Brno odd. C), IČ 25510673
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BENEFIT plus CZ, s.r.o.
Description
Daňová, účetní a poradenská kancelář BENEFIT plus CZ, s.r.o. založená v roce 1997, poskytuje služby daňového poradenství, účetnictví a poradenství širokému spektru klientů od drobných podnikatelů po větší společnosti včetně neziskových organizací. Společnost je profesně pojištěna a odborně zastřešena certifikovanou daňovou poradkyní.
Key services
daňové poradenství, účetnictví, poradenské služby
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, jQuery 1.12.4, Contact Form 7 plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Website uses outdated WordPress and jQuery versions, posing security risks.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond WordPress core and Contact Form 7.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  9. Content is professional and finance-related, safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an outdated WordPress 4.9.26 platform with jQuery 1.12.4, which are known to have security vulnerabilities. The site uses Contact Form 7 for forms but lacks modern performance optimizations. The design is basic with moderate mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses Font Awesome icons. There is no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, requiring updates to reduce technical debt and improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with benefitplus.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review benefitplus.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.