Skip to main content

Security report for bellisky.cz

Aliance žen s rakovinou prsu, o.p.s. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bellis is a project operated by the Aliance žen s rakovinou prsu, o.p.s., focused on supporting young women undergoing or having undergone breast cancer treatment. The website serves as an informational and community platform offering patient stories, prevention advice, projects, and events. It targets a niche audience within the Czech Republic and operates as a small non-profit entity. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, and Google Tag Manager, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust from a registration perspective, but the presence of partner logos and clear contact information supports legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy within its domain, but improvements in transparency and security policies are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bellisky.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bellis occupies a specialized niche in healthcare non-profit services, focusing on breast cancer patient support in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized patient stories, community engagement, and partnerships with recognized organizations like Roche and breastcancer.cz. The business model is donation and project-based, with clear calls for support and contact points. The website's content strategy emphasizes education, prevention, and emotional support, targeting young women affected by breast cancer. Growth potential is linked to expanding awareness campaigns and partnerships. The digital presence is mature with SEO and social media integration, supporting outreach and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented according to GDPR standards. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could be exploited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response plan limits transparency and preparedness. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance WHOIS registration transparency or provide domain ownership verification to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aliance žen s rakovinou prsu, o. p. s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aliance žen s rakovinou prsu, o.p.s.
Description
Bellis je projekt Aliance žen s rakovinou prsu, o.p.s. Zaměřuje se na pomoc a podporu mladých pacientek (v produktivním věku), které procházejí nebo prošly léčbou spojenou s nádorovým onemocněním prsu.
Key services
Patient support, Educational content, Projects and events, Awareness campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Ajax Load More plugin, Beautiful and Responsive Cookie Consent plugin, Lity lightbox
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern cookie consent mechanisms.
  4. Content is focused on breast cancer patient support and awareness.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with named project managers and official emails.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  7. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  9. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  10. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and common plugin ecosystem including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and cookie consent management plugins. The front-end uses jQuery and Lity lightbox for UI interactions. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic but present, with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bellisky.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bellisky.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.