Skip to main content

Security report for belectric.com

BELECTRIC GmbH · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BELECTRIC GmbH is a medium-sized German company specializing in the development, construction, and operation of solar power plants with over 20 years of experience and a total installed capacity exceeding 5.4 GW worldwide. As a member of the Elevion Group, it holds a strong market position in Europe, offering comprehensive services including EPC, project development, innovation, and O&M. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern SEO and accessibility practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. Overall, the company demonstrates strong business credibility and compliance with GDPR, making it a trustworthy partner in the renewable energy sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching belectric.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BELECTRIC operates in the renewable energy sector focusing on solar energy solutions, targeting businesses and organizations requiring large-scale photovoltaic installations. Its business model integrates project development, EPC, and O&M services, supported by a network of subsidiaries across Europe. The company leverages its membership in the Elevion Group to enhance financial strength and market reach. Growth indicators include ongoing large-scale projects and active participation in international trade fairs. The company maintains a professional online presence with comprehensive content, social media engagement, and clear compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism via Borlabs Cookie, indicating good privacy compliance. The use of FriendlyCaptcha for forms enhances protection against automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response and vulnerability disclosure page with clear contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and enhance domain security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BELECTRIC GmbH
Description
With more than 20 years of experience in international plant construction, BELECTRIC is the ideal partner in the field of solar energy. They develop and construct solar power plants and provide operations & maintenance services.
Key services
Development and construction of solar power plants, Operations & Maintenance (O&M), Project development, Innovation & system design, Nature compatibility consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Borlabs Cookie plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Tiny Slider, Slick Carousel, Responsive Vector Maps, FriendlyCaptcha
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent mechanism with Borlabs Cookie
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
  • Use of CAPTCHA for forms (FriendlyCaptcha)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via gtag, consent-based)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong focus on solar energy and sustainability.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Good SEO and accessibility practices.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  8. Social media presence is active and linked.
  9. Domain registration data supports business legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for optimization, Borlabs Cookie for consent management, and FriendlyCaptcha for form security. The site uses jQuery and various JavaScript libraries for UI components like sliders and maps. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site demonstrates strong SEO practices with comprehensive metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting details are not explicit, but domain registration is stable and consistent with the business history. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by implementing additional security headers and continuous monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with belectric.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review belectric.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.