Skip to main content

Security report for begonija.lv

SIA Begonija · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Begonija is a Latvian-based tour operator and travel agency providing tourism services primarily to local and regional customers. The website presents basic company information including physical address, registration number, and contact details, establishing a modest but legitimate online presence. The business targets travelers seeking organized tours and travel arrangements in Latvia. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking, and Google Fonts for typography. The site is basic in design and mobile optimization, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers and privacy policies. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification, but the visible business data aligns with a legitimate small enterprise. Overall, the site is functional but lacks advanced compliance and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching begonija.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Begonija operates in the hospitality sector as a small-sized travel agency and tour operator in Latvia. The company leverages a straightforward business model focused on providing travel services to tourists. The presence of a Latvian registration number and physical office address supports its legitimacy. The website does not indicate partnerships or subsidiaries, and no social media presence is evident. Revenue streams likely derive from travel bookings and tour arrangements. The company appears to maintain a low digital footprint with basic marketing and tracking tools. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not visible from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage assumed but not explicitly confirmed. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. The absence of forms reduces attack vectors, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Tracking via Google Analytics and Tag Manager is present, but privacy compliance is minimal. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to improve site security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and enhance SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and trust.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Begonija
Registration number
LV40003104895
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Begonija
Description
Begonija is a tour operator and travel agency based in Riga, Latvia, offering tourism-related services.
Key services
Tour operator services, Travel agency services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (not explicitly confirmed in HTML)
  • No forms detected to collect user input

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small Latvian travel agency with basic online presence.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No forms or user input fields detected, reducing attack surface.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust analysis.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source; security posture could be improved.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with company registration number.
  8. No social media links found on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML with linked CSS and external resources from Google Fonts and Google Analytics. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a simple static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but present via viewport meta tag. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are limited. The site could benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements, enhanced SEO metadata, and adoption of security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with begonija.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review begonija.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.