Skip to main content

Security report for beeld.be

Kunstwerkt · Media · Belgium

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beeld is a specialized online platform operated by Kunstwerkt, focused on showcasing visual artwork and supporting artists through features like open calls and artist profiles. The platform targets the visual arts community primarily in Belgium and Dutch-speaking regions. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, uses modern analytics tools with privacy considerations, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and privacy-respecting analytics, though some security headers and explicit security policies are missing. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, but lacks direct contact information and formal security incident response details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beeld.be

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche in the arts and non-profit sector, providing a digital space for artists to showcase work and engage with open calls. Its business model revolves around community engagement and service provision rather than direct sales. Partnerships with Kunstwerkt, Cera cooperative, and the Flemish government indicate a stable support ecosystem. The website's content and services are tailored to artists and art organizations, with growth potential in digital arts promotion. The absence of direct contact info may limit some user engagement but aligns with a platform model rather than a commercial enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, anonymized IP tracking in analytics, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and does not provide a public security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap in transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, security is adequate but could be improved with formal policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and responsible disclosure.
  4. Consider adding verified company contact information to improve user trust and support.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kunstwerkt
Description
Beeld is an online platform that collects and showcases visual artwork from thousands of artists. It offers features to display personal artwork, browse artworks, search for artists, and participate in open calls.
Key services
Artwork showcasing, Artist profiles, Open calls listing and management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, CookiesJSR, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Do Not Track respected in Matomo

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
Matomo, CookiesJSR
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional platform for visual artists and art community.
  2. Content is in Dutch with English alternate language available.
  3. Uses modern CMS (Drupal 10) and analytics tools with privacy considerations.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram linked.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS, a modern and secure platform, combined with Google Analytics and Matomo for analytics, respecting privacy through IP anonymization and Do Not Track. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently, uses cookie consent management via CookiesJSR, and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registrar is reputable. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present, indicating good compliance. SEO is supported by canonical tags, hreflang attributes, and meta descriptions, though some meta descriptions are empty. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beeld.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beeld.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.