Skip to main content

Security report for beabasil.lv

Bea Basil · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bea Basil is a small family-owned restaurant and confectionery located in the Grīziņkalns area of Riga, Latvia. The business focuses on providing a warm, cozy atmosphere with a menu emphasizing fresh, local ingredients including vegetarian and vegan options. The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and public security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beabasil.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets local customers and visitors seeking quality dining experiences with a family-friendly environment. It offers onsite dining, takeaway, and event catering services including weddings, jubilees, corporate events, and funerals. The market position is that of a niche local hospitality provider emphasizing quality and atmosphere. The company leverages social media (Instagram) and customer reviews to build trust. Revenue streams likely include direct restaurant sales and event catering. The business ecosystem appears localized without evident partnerships or subsidiaries.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and standard WordPress security plugins but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security contact channels are not publicly available, limiting transparency. Overall security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish incident response and security contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Configure Google Analytics properly via MonsterInsights to ensure accurate data collection and privacy controls.
  5. Consider enabling DNSSEC and regularly monitor WHOIS data to maintain domain registration integrity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bea Basil
Description
Bea Basil is a family restaurant and confectionery located in the heart of Grīziņkalns, Riga. It offers a calm urban oasis with a warm and cozy atmosphere, serving local products with vegetarian and vegan options. The restaurant emphasizes fresh local ingredients and a family-friendly environment.
Key services
Restaurant dining, Confectionery products, Event catering (weddings, jubilees, corporate events, funerals), Takeaway and delivery (pre-order required)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Elementor, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, Trustindex
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based family restaurant site with good content and navigation.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected explicitly.
  3. Contact information limited to phone number only, no email or physical address found.
  4. No visible security or incident response policies.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. Uses Google Analytics but MonsterInsights plugin is not fully configured.
  7. Social media presence on Instagram is integrated.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with Astra theme and Elementor page builder, supported by Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg. It uses jQuery and several plugins for enhanced functionality including customer reviews and social media integration. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but lacks advanced optimization. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. There is room for technical improvements in security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beabasil.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beabasil.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.