Skip to main content

Security report for bbiinternational.com

BBI International · Energy · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

51/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BBI International operates as a specialized media and events company serving the biofuels, biomass, biodiesel, ethanol, carbon capture, sustainable fuels, and unmanned aircraft systems industries. The company publishes multiple niche magazines and organizes several well-established conferences and expos, positioning itself as a key information and networking hub within these sectors. The website content reflects a focused business model targeting industry professionals and companies seeking news, education, and event participation. Technically, the website runs on a Microsoft IIS server using ASP.NET with legacy jQuery scripts and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. However, the site lacks HTTPS, exposing visitors to security risks and undermining trust. Security posture is weak with no SSL certificate, no advanced security headers, and no cookie consent mechanisms, indicating compliance gaps especially regarding GDPR. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business profile, confirming legitimacy and consistent registration details. Overall, the site provides relevant content but requires significant security and privacy improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bbiinternational.com

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
51

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BBI International holds a strong market position as a niche media and events provider in the renewable energy and technology sectors, particularly biofuels and sustainable fuels. Its competitive advantage lies in its portfolio of specialized publications and long-running industry conferences that attract global participants. The business model relies on content publishing and event management, generating revenue through subscriptions, advertising, and event fees. The target audience includes industry professionals, producers, technology providers, and researchers. The company maintains partnerships with multiple domain-specific event sites, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include ongoing event scheduling and active publication updates. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to modernize the digital platform and enhance security and privacy compliance to maintain trust and expand market reach.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is low due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to interception and data tampering risks. The lack of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms further weakens the security and privacy posture. No evidence of incident response policies or security certifications was found. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may introduce additional vulnerabilities. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations are apparent due to missing cookie policies and consent. The business impact of these issues includes potential loss of user trust, regulatory penalties, and increased risk of cyberattacks. Incident response readiness appears minimal or undocumented. Overall, the security culture and practices require significant enhancement to align with industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure user connections.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Develop and publish a comprehensive cookie policy and implement a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  4. Update JavaScript libraries to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and publish security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  6. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to improve DNS security and certificate issuance control.
  7. Improve accessibility and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and SEO.
  8. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Microsoft IIS 10.0 and built using ASP.NET 4.0.30319, indicating a legacy technology stack. The front-end uses an outdated jQuery 1.4.3 library, which may pose security risks. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the page size and resource count are zero, suggesting incomplete or minimal performance data. The site uses a custom CMS or framework based on ASP.NET. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features observed. The technical debt is moderate due to legacy technologies and missing modern security and performance features. Modernization opportunities include upgrading the tech stack, implementing HTTPS, and enhancing SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bbiinternational.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bbiinternational.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.