Skip to main content

Security report for bbh.cz

BBH, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BBH, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o. is a well-established Czech law firm founded in 1999, specializing in banking, financial, insurance, corporate, IT/IP, real estate, and dispute resolution legal services. The firm targets clients requiring expert legal counsel in these sectors and positions itself as a trusted, experienced legal partner with a strong client success record. The website reflects a professional image with detailed team presentations and service descriptions, supporting its market position. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including jQuery and Google Analytics, hosted on websupport.cz infrastructure. It demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and basic accessibility. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and structured navigation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security or incident response policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partial due to the absence of a dedicated privacy policy page, though cookie consent is managed responsibly. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional with a strong business credibility score. Strategic improvements include publishing a privacy policy, enhancing security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to further strengthen security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bbh.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BBH operates in the legal services sector focusing on finance-related law and corporate legal matters. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting corporate and financial clients in the Czech Republic. The firm leverages its long-standing market presence since 1999 and a team of experienced legal professionals to maintain competitive advantage. Revenue streams likely derive from legal consulting, litigation, and transactional services. The website indicates a partnership with adZONE for web design but no other explicit partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators include active news updates and a comprehensive team roster. The firm’s digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced compliance transparency.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced with strong SSL, and cookie consent is implemented to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy is published, and no dedicated security contact is provided. The use of Google Analytics is configured to deny analytics storage by default, reflecting privacy awareness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BBH, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ26143119
Registration number
26143119
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BBH, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o.
Description
Advokátní kancelář BBH nabízí služby v oblastech Bankovní, finanční a pojišťovací právo, Kapitálové trhy, M&A, Korporátní právo, Soudní spory, rozhodčí a jiná řízení, Právo nemovitostí, IT/IP a Soutěžní právo
Key services
Banking law, Financial and insurance law, Capital markets, Mergers & Acquisitions, Corporate law, Litigation and arbitration, Real estate law, IT/IP law, Competition law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.1.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Custom JavaScript modules, CSS stylesheets
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear presentation of legal services and team members.
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed explanation.
  4. No explicit privacy policy page found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. Use of Google Analytics with consent denied by default, indicating privacy awareness.
  7. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery 3.1.1. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Ads scripts asynchronously for performance. The site uses multiple custom JavaScript modules for UI components such as popup menus, slideshows, and cookie consent. Hosting is provided by websupport.cz, indicated by the domain’s nameservers. Performance is fast with minimal memory usage and quick execution times. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive meta tags and mobile menu support. SEO is supported by meta descriptions, keywords, and structured navigation menus. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site build.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bbh.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bbh.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.