Skip to main content

Security report for bayfrontstpete.com

Orlando Health Bayfront Hospital · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orlando Health Bayfront Hospital is a large, well-established healthcare provider and academic medical center located in the United States. It offers a wide range of medical services including trauma care, cardiovascular surgery, maternity care, and rehabilitation services. The hospital is affiliated with Orlando Health and provides graduate medical education programs, positioning itself as a trusted regional healthcare institution. The website demonstrates good content quality, consistent branding, and a professional design tailored to patients and medical professionals. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is moderate with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacking a visible cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not detract from the overall legitimacy based on website content and external references.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bayfrontstpete.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hospital operates in the healthcare sector with a business model focused on patient care and medical education. It leverages partnerships with Orlando Health and related entities for donations and billing services. The target audience includes patients, healthcare professionals, and community members. The website's integration with multiple trusted external domains and social media platforms supports a strong partnership ecosystem. The hospital's market position is that of a reputable regional healthcare provider with academic credentials. Growth indicators include active content updates and volunteer opportunities. The business maintains a professional online presence with clear navigation and relevant healthcare content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable analytics and marketing tools. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. There is no published vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance security transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from implementing additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, improving user trust and legal compliance.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues and demonstrate security maturity.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve communication channels for security concerns.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain transparency and reduce suspicion regarding domain legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Orlando Health Bayfront Hospital
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orlando Health Bayfront Hospital
Description
Orlando Health Bayfront Hospital is a level II trauma and tertiary care center. Licensed as a 480-bed hospital with an inpatient rehabilitation unit on campus. It has more than 550 affiliated physicians and serves as an academic medical center offering graduate physician programs in family practice, obstetrics-gynecology, and a post-residency fellowship in sports medicine.
Key services
Heart Care (Cardiovascular), Emergency Services and Trauma Care, Maternity Care, Surgical Services, Rehabilitation Services, Neuroscience Institute, Medical Professionals training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Bing Ads, AngularJS 1.5.6, RequireJS, Modernizr, Google Maps API
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data missing, unusual for a healthcare domain
  4. Strong branding and consistent design
  5. Multiple external trusted domains linked
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn
  9. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  10. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including AngularJS, RequireJS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Bing Ads scripts. It loads asynchronously and defers non-critical scripts to optimize performance. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter Card metadata. The site does not appear to use a common CMS or hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in script optimization and caching strategies. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated further by updating legacy frameworks and enhancing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bayfrontstpete.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bayfrontstpete.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.