Skip to main content

Security report for barselekter.com

Bars Elekter · Energy · Estonia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bars Elekter is a medium-sized industrial company specializing in energy and transportation sector services and products. As a subsidiary of BLRT Grupp, it benefits from a strong regional presence in the Baltic Sea area with branches in Estonia and Norway. The company offers multidisciplinary engineering, project management, and specialized solutions such as shore connection packages and hybrid energy storage. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure including Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain protections, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner but no privacy policy page. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, supporting the company's established market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching barselekter.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention barselekter.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
33%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for barselekter.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bars Elekter operates in the energy and transportation sectors, targeting industrial clients requiring engineering and technical solutions. The business model is B2B, focusing on delivering complex projects and product solutions. The company leverages its parent company BLRT Grupp's industrial holding status to maintain market credibility. Key competitive advantages include a broad service portfolio, registered patents, and a track record of 500 completed projects worldwide. The company maintains a digital presence with regular news updates but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures. Growth potential is supported by multidisciplinary services and regional expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection. However, it lacks DNSSEC and important HTTP security headers, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but privacy policy absence is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be improved with enhanced security controls and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency
  4. Establish and publish a security policy including incident response contacts to enhance trust
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bars Elekter
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bars Elekter
Description
Bars Elekter is a subsidiary of BLRT Grupp, one of the largest industrial holdings in the Baltic Sea region. The company has branches in Estonia and Norway. They provide multidisciplinary services, products, and solutions mainly in energy and transportation sectors, including engineering, project management, shore connection packages, hybrid and energy storage solutions, process automation, systems integration, and vessel upgrades.
Key services
Engineering (CAD and 3D), Project management, Shore connection solutions, Hybrid and energy storage solutions, Process automation, Systems integration, Low & Medium Voltage Supply, Vessel upgrade & conversion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Swiper.js, Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice plugin, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented and visible
  4. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly presented
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Tag Manager for analytics
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well aged
  9. No suspicious or malicious indicators found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using common plugins like Contact Form 7 and Cookie Notice. It employs jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Fancybox for UI components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but no explicit hosting provider was identified. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt is low but security enhancements and privacy compliance improvements are needed to reduce risk and align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with barselekter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review barselekter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.