Skip to main content

Security report for barion.com

Barion · Finance · Hungary

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Barion is a payment service provider offering comprehensive payment solutions, programmatic advertising, and advanced analytics to help businesses grow. The company targets business clients and developers, positioning itself as a versatile and integrated payment platform. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies such as React, Next.js, and Builder.io, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and script isolation via Partytown, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not evident in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional presentation and consistent branding. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, adding security headers, and publishing vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and security.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of barion.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching barion.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Barion operates in the finance and technology sectors, providing payment gateway services, analytics, and advertising solutions. Its business model revolves around facilitating payments and offering data-driven insights to clients. The company maintains a multi-language website targeting European markets, with contact information and social media presence supporting customer engagement. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on business clients, leveraging partnerships and integrations to expand its market reach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern script management techniques to isolate third-party scripts, reducing attack surface. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the visible content. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels to improve security transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Barion
Description
Payment solutions, programmatic advertizing, advanced analytics: Barion is a payment provider that covers all bases and helps businesses grow.
Key services
Payment processing, Programmatic advertising, Advanced analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Builder.io, Google Tag Manager, Partytown
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Partytown for script isolation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Barion pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-oriented, focusing on payment solutions and analytics.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Contact information is available via structured data but no visible contact forms detected.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks indicates good technical maturity.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Social media presence is linked and consistent with company branding.
  8. No suspicious or malicious domains detected in external links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, integrated with Builder.io CMS for content management. It uses Google Tag Manager and Partytown for analytics and script isolation, indicating a modern and performance-conscious architecture. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The lack of visible hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for enhancement in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100 +12Low24 findingsView report
  2. 71/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with barion.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review barion.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.