Skip to main content

Security report for bankonbet.com

Finance · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bankonbet.com is an online casino and sports betting platform primarily targeting Finnish users but also supporting multiple languages for international reach. The site offers a variety of gambling services including casino games, sports betting, live betting, virtual sports, challenges, tournaments, and VIP programs. The business appears to be relatively new, founded in 2021, and operates in the finance sector focused on gambling. The website uses modern web technologies such as Angular and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics and tracking. Cookie consent is managed via a third-party script, indicating some level of privacy compliance, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bankonbet.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bankonbet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
289
Employees
0
Customers
289
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bankonbet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the competitive online gambling market, offering a broad range of betting and gaming services. Its multi-language support suggests an international market approach. The business model is based on online gambling revenue streams including casino games and sports betting. The lack of visible contact information and legal disclosures in the provided content may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. The domain age and WHOIS data are consistent with a legitimate new entrant in the gambling sector. The platform leverages partnerships with third-party services for analytics and customer support but does not expose any suspicious or privacy-protected WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the HTML content, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. The site uses modern frameworks and third-party services but lacks visible forms or input fields in the snapshot, limiting exposure to input-based vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Implement and disclose an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online casino and sports betting platform offering games, sports betting, live betting, virtual sports, challenges, tournaments, VIP levels, and a shop.
Key services
Online casino games, Sports betting, Live betting, Virtual sports, Challenges and tournaments, VIP program, Shop for bonuses or items
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 18.2.13, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script, Zendesk (support chat), Fonts.googleapis.com (Sofia Sans fonts)
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain statuses clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script, Zendesk
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an online casino and sports betting platform targeting Finnish and international users.
  2. Content is mostly placeholder or skeleton loading states in the provided HTML snapshot, indicating dynamic content loading.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a third-party script.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  6. Security headers are not visible in the HTML; DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. Uses modern Angular framework and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  8. No visible forms or data collection fields in the provided HTML snapshot.
  9. No social media links or company legal information found.
  10. Website content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 18.2.13, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, which can improve performance and security. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics, and cookie consent is managed via a third-party script. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses web fonts from Google Fonts. Performance appears moderate based on the skeleton loading states in the HTML snapshot. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The lack of visible security headers and DNSSEC are technical gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more comprehensive SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bankonbet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bankonbet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.