Skip to main content

Security report for bananafitness.lv

Banana Fitnesa Studija · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Banana Fitnesa Studija is a small local fitness studio based in Latvia offering a wide range of fitness classes including Pilates, Yoga, Zumba, and specialized training for different age groups. The website is built on WordPress with multilingual support and integrates various modern web technologies such as Google Maps and YouTube embedding. The business model focuses on in-person fitness services with mandatory online scheduling and a penalty system for cancellations. The site provides clear contact information and social media presence, supporting customer engagement. Technically, the site is moderately optimized with good mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bananafitness.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a professional fitness studio with experienced trainers targeting a broad audience interested in health and wellness. The business leverages online scheduling and social media for customer interaction. The market is local, focusing on Latvian clients, with content in Latvian and Russian. The business model is service-oriented with revenue from class subscriptions and personal training. The website content is detailed and informative, indicating a mature understanding of customer needs. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies may affect compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which may indicate limited formal security governance. The use of popular WordPress plugins and themes suggests the need for regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities. Tracking scripts from Google Tag Manager and Google Ads are present, but no explicit cookie consent mechanism is implemented, raising privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Deploy a web application firewall (WAF) to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Introduce a cookie consent banner to inform users about tracking and obtain consent.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Banana Fitnesa Studija
Description
Banana Fitnesa Studija is a fitness studio offering a variety of fitness classes and training programs focused on health, beauty, endurance, and well-being. They provide classes such as Pilates, Yoga, Slowly & Strong, Roll & Stretch, Junior Fitness, Brazilian Butt, FIT BOX, Zumba, Gym For Ladies, Bike, Core, Pilates Strong, Pump, Tabata, and Functional TR. The studio emphasizes online scheduling, mandatory reservations, and a penalty system for cancellations or no-shows. The business targets individuals interested in fitness and wellness, including children and adolescents.
Key services
Fitness classes, Personal training, Online class scheduling
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Maps API, YouTube iframe API, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based fitness studio site with multilingual support (Latvian and Russian).
  2. Content is rich with detailed descriptions of fitness classes and trainers.
  3. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly provided.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  7. Site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  8. Google Tag Manager and Google Ads tracking scripts are present.
  9. No forms with personal data collection visible except contact form plugin scripts.
  10. No signs of adult or NSFW content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins like WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, and WPML for multilingual support. It uses jQuery and Google APIs for enhanced functionality. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and YouTube. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider elements. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data (JSON-LD) found. The site lacks advanced security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are technical risks for user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bananafitness.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bananafitness.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.