Skip to main content

Security report for baltijasarhitekts.lv

Baltijas Arhitekts · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltijas Arhitekts is a small architectural and construction service provider based in Latvia, offering comprehensive services including building design, construction support, 3D visualization, building permit facilitation, and engineering communications design. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Rank Math SEO, indicating a modern and maintainable technical infrastructure. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, though security headers and formal privacy policies are absent. The site content is professional and targeted at individuals and businesses seeking architectural services in Latvia, with no adult or questionable content detected. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltijasarhitekts.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, focusing on architectural design and construction services. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting local clients in Latvia. The website's SEO and structured data implementation suggest an intent to attract organic traffic effectively. However, the absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies may limit trust and conversion potential. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and professional content quality, positioning itself as a niche player in the Latvian architectural market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Include clear and verified contact information such as company emails and phone numbers on the website.
  5. Regularly review and update the website's technical stack and security measures to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltijas Arhitekts
Description
Piedāvājam ēku projektēšanas, būvniecības un 3D vizualizācijas pakalpojumus, kā arī ēku nodošanu ekspluatācijā un inženierkomunikāciju projektēšanu.
Key services
ēku projektēšana, būvniecības pakalpojumi, 3D vizualizācijas, ēku nodošana ekspluatācijā, inženierkomunikāciju projektēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Rank Math SEO, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  2. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info available.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Rank Math SEO plugin.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for form security.
  8. Content is professional, relevant to architectural and construction services, and safe for general audiences.
  9. External links mostly to Google services and a personal site (coltana.com) linked in author structured data.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Rank Math SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible platform. It uses Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA for user interface and security enhancements. Performance appears moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO metadata and structured data are well implemented, supporting search engine visibility. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. There is an opportunity to improve technical security by adding missing HTTP security headers and enhancing privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltijasarhitekts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltijasarhitekts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.