Skip to main content

Security report for balticwedding.lv

BalticWedding - Ainārs Krauklis · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BalticWedding.lv is a Latvian wedding photography and videography service provider with over 20 years of experience, targeting couples planning their weddings in Latvia. The website showcases portfolios, client testimonials, and offers direct contact via WhatsApp, emphasizing a friendly and artistic approach to wedding media. Technically, the site is built on the Wfolio platform, using modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with standard security headers and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with GDPR compliance implied. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy business with moderate risk due to lack of WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balticwedding.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention balticwedding.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for balticwedding.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BalticWedding operates in the hospitality sector, specifically wedding services, with a small business profile. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience and personalized artistic approach. Revenue streams likely come from wedding video and photography packages. The target market is Latvian wedding couples seeking quality media coverage. The website integrates tracking and marketing tools to support customer engagement and conversion. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The business appears focused on direct client relationships and portfolio showcasing, with growth potential tied to reputation and client referrals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of security headers, reducing common web risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent mechanisms present but no detailed data retention policies. The use of third-party analytics and tracking services requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and responsible disclosure.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and cookie usage in an accessible manner.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise.
  5. Consider DNSSEC adoption and ensure WHOIS data is accessible to improve domain registration trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BalticWedding - Ainārs Krauklis
Description
Mēs iemūžinām mirkļus jūsu kāzu dienā – emocionālus kāzu video un kāzu fotogrāfijas. BalticWedding – vairāk kā 20 gadu pieredze kāzu nozarē.
Key services
Wedding video filming, Wedding photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Font Awesome, Wfolio platform
Frameworks
Wfolio CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to wedding services.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found in main navigation but URLs exist.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Contact information includes WhatsApp phone link but no explicit email found in HTML.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  9. Site uses HTTPS and appears secure with standard security headers likely in place.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wfolio CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Font Awesome icons. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but the reliance on third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security vigilance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balticwedding.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balticwedding.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.