Skip to main content

Security report for baltictour.com

Baltic Tour · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Tour is a specialized tour operator offering escorted and private tours primarily in the Baltic countries and surrounding regions. Established in 2004, the company provides a variety of themed tours including classical, biking, lifestyle, and educational tours targeting tourists interested in cultural and historical experiences. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content focused on their niche market. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and SVG graphics, hosted on Rackspeed Cloud infrastructure. Mobile optimization and user experience are good, though accessibility and SEO are basic. Security posture is moderate with no advanced security headers or DNSSEC enabled, and no visible HTTPS data was provided. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information is not explicitly provided in the HTML content analyzed. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve in security and privacy compliance to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltictour.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention baltictour.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for baltictour.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltic Tour operates in the hospitality and transportation sectors as a small-sized company with a long-standing presence since 2004. Its business model focuses on providing curated group and private tours in the Baltic region, leveraging cultural and natural attractions. The company targets tourists seeking immersive travel experiences in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Scandinavia. The website supports their market position with detailed tour offerings and seasonal events. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports marketing efforts. The lack of explicit contact details on the website is a minor gap. No certifications or formal partnerships were identified. The company benefits from a stable domain registration and consistent branding, positioning it as a credible niche tour operator.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but has room for improvement. The domain is registered with eNom, LLC since 2004 without privacy protection, which supports legitimacy. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected. The absence of HTTPS data in the provided content limits full SSL assessment, but it is assumed HTTPS is in use given modern standards. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. No incident response or security policies are published. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. Overall, the site is low risk but should enhance security headers, enable DNSSEC, and implement privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  5. Conduct a security audit to verify HTTPS configuration and implement best practices for data protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltic Tour
Description
Baltic Tour offers escorted and private tours in the Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) and surrounding regions, including Poland and Scandinavia. They provide a variety of themed tours such as classical, biking, lifestyle, and educational tours.
Key services
Escorted group tours, Private customized tours, Themed tours (classical, biking, lifestyle, educational), Seasonal and event-based tours (Christmas markets, New Year celebrations)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, SVG, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional tour operator site focused on Baltic region tours.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  3. Social media links to Facebook and Instagram are present and appear legitimate.
  4. No forms detected in the HTML content; no direct data collection observed.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms visible on the main page.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with eNom, LLC since 2004 with clientTransferProhibited status.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in the provided data.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  9. Website content is well structured with clear navigation and tour offerings.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and SVG for graphics. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Hosting is provided by Rackspeed Cloud, which suggests a reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with preloading of key assets like fonts and stylesheets. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tags and responsive images. SEO is basic with meta description and title tags but no Open Graph or structured data found. Accessibility is basic with alt attributes on images but no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. The site is well structured but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltictour.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltictour.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.