Skip to main content

Security report for balticindustrial.com

Baltic Industrial OÜ · Energy · Estonia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Industrial OÜ is an established service provider in the Baltic region specializing in repair, diagnostics, and maintenance solutions primarily for the energy sector. With over 20 years of experience and a professional team, the company positions itself as a trusted partner for businesses requiring comprehensive industrial maintenance services. The website reflects this positioning with clear business descriptions and a professional design, targeting companies in need of industrial repair and maintenance in Estonia and neighboring countries. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed, but DNS servers suggest regional hosting providers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protections enabled. However, it lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which could pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, Baltic Industrial demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation but should prioritize enhancing privacy compliance and security best practices to reduce risk and improve trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in these areas will strengthen their digital maturity and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balticindustrial.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltic Industrial operates in the energy sector within the Baltic region, leveraging two decades of experience to offer repair, diagnostics, and maintenance services. Their business model focuses on B2B service provision, targeting industrial clients requiring reliable maintenance solutions. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and social media engagement, which supports market positioning as a professional and experienced provider. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts and maintenance agreements. The absence of privacy and security policies online suggests an opportunity to enhance customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company does not appear to have subsidiaries or parent companies, indicating an independent medium-sized enterprise with a focused regional footprint.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain transfer protections are in place, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness for security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided data, but ongoing monitoring and security hardening are recommended to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve browser security.
  4. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and WordPress plugins to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltic Industrial OÜ
Description
Baltic Industrial – Teie usaldusväärne partner Baltikumis remondi, diagnostika ja hoolduse lahenduste pakkumisel. 20 aastat kogemust ja professionaalne meeskond. Täislahendus Teie ettevõtte vajadustele. Võta ühendust!
Key services
Repair solutions, Diagnostics, Maintenance services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear business focus on repair and maintenance services in Baltic region
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No security or incident response policies published
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor builder and standard scripts
  5. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  6. WHOIS data consistent with business claims and domain age
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, which provides a modern and flexible design framework. It uses jQuery and Google Tag Manager for interactivity and analytics. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for moderate performance, though some CSS and JavaScript files are cached and optimized via a caching/acceleration plugin. Hosting details are inferred from DNS servers but not explicitly stated. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO enhancements but includes proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage schema. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security and privacy implementations are needed to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balticindustrial.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balticindustrial.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.