Skip to main content

Security report for balthos.com

Baltic Hospitality Group · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Hospitality Group is a specialized supplier of hotel and restaurant equipment, guest amenities, furniture, and spa products primarily serving the EU market. Established in 2003, the company positions itself as a provider of unique, qualitative, and environmentally friendly solutions tailored for the hospitality industry. Their website reflects a professional B2B business model targeting hotels, restaurants, and related hospitality businesses. The company maintains a consistent brand presence with clear contact channels and social media engagement. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, FancyBox, and Google reCAPTCHA to enhance user experience and security. Hosting is provided by One.com A/S, with a domain age indicating a mature online presence. The site is mobile optimized and includes SEO best practices, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements Google reCAPTCHA on forms to mitigate spam. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Privacy compliance is basic but includes a privacy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional with a good security posture for its business type. Strategic improvements in DNS security and HTTP headers would enhance protection. The business is credible with consistent WHOIS data and no suspicious indicators. The site content is safe for general audiences and well-aligned with its hospitality industry focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balthos.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltic Hospitality Group operates as a niche B2B supplier in the hospitality sector, focusing on hotel and restaurant equipment and related products. Their competitive advantage lies in offering environmentally friendly and functional interior solutions. The company targets hospitality businesses across the EU, leveraging a mature domain and consistent branding to build trust. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales and customized guest amenities. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms for marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators include a broad product catalog and active content updates. The company maintains direct customer contact via phone, email, and inquiry forms, supporting a personalized sales approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam measures via Google reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No public incident response or security policies are available, which limits transparency on handling security events. Data protection practices appear basic, with privacy and cookie policies in place but no dedicated data protection officer or vulnerability disclosure program. The security culture could be improved by publishing explicit policies and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltic Hospitality Group
Description
Baltic Hospitality Group provides unique, qualitative, environmentally-friendly, and functional solutions in interior arrangements for leading hotels and restaurants.
Key services
Hotel equipment, Restaurant equipment, Guest amenities, Furniture, SPA products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.1.3, jQuery, FancyBox, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Google Analytics, Slick Slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 on forms to prevent spam
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to hospitality industry.
  3. Contact information and social media links are clearly provided.
  4. Forms use Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  6. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  7. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed.
  8. Website uses modern frontend technologies and is mobile optimized.
  9. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 4.1.3, jQuery, FancyBox, and Slick Slider for UI components and interactivity. Google reCAPTCHA v2 is integrated for form security, and Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis. Hosting is provided by One.com A/S, consistent with WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with standard CDN usage for fonts and scripts. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balthos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balthos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.