Skip to main content

Security report for baltenergy.lv

SIA „BALT-ENERGY” · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA „BALT-ENERGY” is a small Latvian company founded in 2008 specializing in alternative energy systems, electrical installation, and security solutions. Their services include design, installation, maintenance, and supervision of electrical and alternative energy systems up to 20kV, as well as video surveillance and telecommunication network services. The website content is primarily in Russian and targets customers interested in green energy and related electrical services. Technically, the website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.4.2 and Fancybox 1.3.1, indicating outdated technology with potential security risks. There is no evidence of modern CMS or advanced frameworks, and mobile optimization is poor. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement information, missing security headers, and use of outdated libraries. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting user trust and compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, reducing domain trustworthiness verification. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltenergy.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention baltenergy.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for baltenergy.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche energy sector focusing on alternative energy solutions and electrical installation services in Latvia. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting both commercial and private clients interested in sustainable energy. The lack of visible certifications or trust signals and minimal digital marketing presence suggests a small-scale operation with limited online engagement. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may hinder customer acquisition and regulatory compliance. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. Growth potential exists if the company modernizes its digital presence and enhances trust through transparency and security.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. Key vulnerabilities include the use of outdated JavaScript libraries with known security issues, absence of HTTPS enforcement details, and lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not appear to use modern security frameworks or best practices. These factors collectively increase the risk of exploitation and reduce user trust. Immediate remediation should focus on upgrading libraries, enforcing HTTPS, adding security headers, and publishing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA „BALT-ENERGY”
Description
SIA „BALT-ENERGY” founded in 2008, provides design, development, installation, maintenance, security, and video control services for alternative energy sources and systems. The company emphasizes high-quality services tailored to customer needs and values environmental sustainability through alternative energy solutions.
Key services
Design and installation of alternative energy systems, Electrical installation and supervision up to 20kV, Video surveillance and security systems, Telecommunication and internet network installation, Maintenance and technical parameter testing of electrical installations
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.4.2, jQuery Fancybox 1.3.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Russian with some Latvian context.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  4. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  5. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Website lacks modern SEO and accessibility features.
  7. No social media links or external trusted references found.
  8. No forms detected on the main page content.
  9. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement information available.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using legacy technologies, primarily jQuery 1.4.2 and Fancybox 1.3.1, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or responsive design, resulting in poor mobile optimization. The HTML structure is basic with minimal SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user data collection. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are unavailable, limiting assessment of infrastructure quality. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modernization and optimization. The site lacks technical debt indicators such as broken links or errors but requires modernization to reduce security risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltenergy.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltenergy.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.