Skip to main content

Security report for bakerconcrete.com

Baker Construction · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baker Construction is a leading commercial concrete construction contractor in the United States, with a strong market position as the #1 ranked concrete specialty contractor on ENR’s list. The company offers key services including industrial, industrial distribution, structural, and restoration construction. Founded in 1968 and operating as a subsidiary of Baker Construction Enterprises, Baker Construction serves a broad commercial and industrial client base. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern technologies and SEO optimizations. The technical infrastructure includes multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, indicating a data-driven approach to user engagement. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, supporting Baker Construction’s enterprise-level stature.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bakerconcrete.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baker Construction’s market positioning as a top concrete contractor is supported by its extensive project portfolio and skilled workforce. The business model focuses on delivering high-quality construction services with an emphasis on safety, quality, and leadership. The company targets commercial and industrial sectors, leveraging its reputation and ENR ranking as competitive advantages. The presence of a dedicated careers portal and co-worker portal indicates investment in workforce development and employee engagement. Partnerships and parent company relationships are clearly linked, enhancing corporate transparency. The website’s content and structure support lead generation and recruitment efforts, reflecting a mature and strategic digital marketing approach.

Security posture

The security maturity of Baker Construction’s website is moderate to good. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration statuses prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security or incident response policies represents gaps in the security framework. The site uses multiple tracking and analytics scripts, which may increase the attack surface if not regularly audited. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is limited by the lack of a cookie consent mechanism, which could pose regulatory risks in certain jurisdictions. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an enterprise website but could be improved with enhanced DNS security and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce potential vulnerabilities and improve performance.
  5. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy to enhance browser security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baker Construction
Description
Baker Concrete Construction is the nation’s leading commercial concrete construction contractor. Our drive is to perform safer, smarter, better, and faster.
Key services
Industrial Construction, Industrial Distribution Construction, Structural Construction, Restoration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Modern Events Calendar plugin, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • No exposed emails in HTML
  • Use of security related scripts (Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging
  3. No blocking or WAF challenge detected
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found
  5. No visible security or incident response policy pages
  6. Domain is long-established and registered with reputable registrar
  7. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking services
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, and FontAwesome. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin, and analytics are comprehensive with Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially in script loading and caching. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting appears to be with GoDaddy, consistent with the registrar data. The site uses multiple external CDNs for fonts and scripts, which is standard practice but requires monitoring for security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bakerconcrete.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bakerconcrete.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.