Skip to main content

Security report for bafht.com

Brockton and Area Family Health Team · Healthcare · Canada

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brockton and Area Family Health Team is a small healthcare organization focused on providing team-based primary care services to the Brockton community and surrounding areas in Canada. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, offering key services such as appointments, patient resources, and standards of care. The domain is well-established since 2010, reinforcing the organization's legitimacy. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with integrations including Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and domain locks in place, but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bafht.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare sector as a non-profit primary care provider, targeting local patients and community members. Its business model centers on delivering comprehensive health services through a team-based approach. The website's content and structure support patient engagement and resource accessibility. Market positioning is local and community-focused, with no evident commercial or e-commerce activities. The absence of privacy policies and cookie consent may expose compliance risks, especially under GDPR or similar regulations. The use of standard web technologies and third-party analytics indicates a moderate digital maturity level. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries linked via the website.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections such as clientDeleteProhibited. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy reduce its defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK introduces potential privacy concerns without explicit user consent. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with modern best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brockton and Area Family Health Team
Description
A healthcare organization providing team-based primary care services to the Brockton and surrounding area community.
Key services
Primary care services, Patient resources, Appointments, Standards of care, Community health programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status domain locks (clientDeleteProhibited etc.)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a healthcare provider site with clear navigation and professional design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Use of standard WordPress and Divi theme technologies.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Moderate use of tracking and analytics scripts without explicit consent mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, leveraging Google Fonts for typography and integrating Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for user tracking. The site uses minified CSS and JS files cached for performance. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC and uses domaincontrol.com nameservers. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bafht.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bafht.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.