Skip to main content

Security report for baclife.sm

Banca Agricola Commerciale · Finance · San Marino

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Banca Agricola Commerciale (BAC) is a well-established financial institution based in San Marino, providing a broad range of banking, investment, and insurance services to both private individuals and businesses. The website reflects a mature and professional presence with comprehensive business information, news updates, and customer resources. The company operates subsidiaries such as BAC Life S.p.A. and BAC Investments, indicating a diversified financial services group. The target audience is primarily local customers in San Marino, with services tailored to their needs including online and mobile banking solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for compliance and marketing. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Maps API, showing a moderate level of digital maturity. However, performance metrics are missing, and some technical debt is evident, especially in the SSL/TLS configuration. From a security perspective, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support modern TLS protocols, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to potential data interception. While some security headers are present, the absence of HTTPS and DNSSEC reduces the overall security posture significantly. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is credible and professional but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS security to protect user data and enhance trust. Strategic recommendations include obtaining a valid SSL certificate, enabling modern TLS protocols, and enhancing DNS and domain protections.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baclife.sm

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BAC holds a strong market position as a traditional bank with over 100 years of history in San Marino. Its business model focuses on retail and corporate banking, investments, and insurance services. The company leverages digital channels such as mobile apps and online banking to serve customers efficiently. The presence of subsidiaries and partner domains indicates a well-structured group ecosystem. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and trust-building with customers. Growth indicators include active news updates and community engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes card providers and local service companies, enhancing service offerings.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are critical for secure communications. The website implements some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting awareness of security best practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and domain protection locks introduces risks of DNS spoofing and domain hijacking. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is supported by privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears moderate but needs strengthening through technical improvements and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data in transit.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable insecure legacy protocols to improve encryption standards.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and domain protection locks to safeguard domain integrity and prevent hijacking.
  4. Develop and publish a formal incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security readiness.
  5. Enhance security headers by adding Content Security Policy (CSP) and other relevant headers to mitigate attacks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Banca Agricola Commerciale Istituto Bancario Sammarinese S.p.A.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.1 with Yoast SEO and Cookiebot plugins, indicating a modern CMS setup focused on SEO and compliance. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing, and Google Maps API is integrated for branch location services. The site uses Ionicons for icons and custom JavaScript for interactive elements. Hosting is on an nginx server with IP 194.183.95.47. Performance data is missing, but the site appears to have moderate loading speed and good mobile responsiveness. Technical risks include lack of SSL/TLS, no OCSP stapling, and no session resumption, which could impact user trust and SEO rankings. Opportunities exist to modernize security and improve performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baclife.sm. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baclife.sm.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.