Skip to main content

Security report for azzolinaphotography.com

Azzolina Photography by Elizabeth Azzolina · Media · United States

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Azzolina Photography by Elizabeth Azzolina is a professional photography business based in Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, serving the Greater Philadelphia area and surrounding regions. The company specializes in wedding, portrait, family, newborn, headshot, branding, and product photography, offering personalized and authentic services to a diverse clientele including couples, families, and professionals. The website showcases an extensive portfolio, client testimonials, and integrates social media channels to engage its audience. Technically, the website is built on the Photofolio.com platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, and Pinterest SDK for tracking and social integration. The site is hosted on a Rackspace CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and rich content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and incident response information, which are areas for improvement. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating full accessibility. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image with strong business credibility. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, implementing security headers, and providing clear security and incident response policies to enhance user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching azzolinaphotography.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention azzolinaphotography.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for azzolinaphotography.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Azzolina Photography operates as a small, local photography service provider with a focus on personalized client relationships and high-quality imagery. The business targets individuals and families in the Philadelphia region, including wedding clients, families with children, newborn parents, and professionals seeking branding and headshots. The business model is service-based, generating revenue through photography sessions and related products. The website's integration with client galleries and booking platforms like ShootProof and UseSession indicates a streamlined client management approach. The presence of client testimonials and active social media channels supports a strong reputation and customer engagement. The company appears well-positioned in its niche market with a consistent brand and quality content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive information in the HTML content. However, it lacks several best practices such as security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options), visible privacy and cookie policies, and incident response contact information. There are no indications of vulnerable libraries or insecure forms, but the absence of explicit security and compliance documentation may pose compliance risks. The site does not implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file. Overall, while the site is not vulnerable to obvious threats, it would benefit from enhanced security transparency and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response policy with clear contact channels for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear terms of service to improve user trust and legal compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Azzolina Photography by Elizabeth Azzolina
Description
Philadelphia Wedding & Portrait Photographer. Based in Huntingdon Valley, PA, serving Philadelphia, parts of New Jersey, Bucks County, and Montgomery County. Specializes in weddings, families, newborns, headshots, branding, and product photography.
Key services
Wedding photography, Portrait photography, Engagement sessions, Family & children photography, Newborn & maternity photography, Headshots & branding, Product photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Pinterest SDK, Web Font Loader, Photofolio.com platform
Platforms
Photofolio.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical link uses https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pinterest
Marketing tools
WeddingWire widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional photography portfolio and service site.
  2. Content is rich with extensive image galleries and client testimonials.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone.
  5. Uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  7. Social media integration is present with multiple platforms linked.
  8. No visible security or compliance certifications.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Photofolio.com platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and integrations such as Google Analytics and Pinterest SDK. It uses a Rackspace CDN for hosting and content delivery, contributing to moderate performance. The site includes responsive design elements and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from additional security and compliance enhancements to meet higher standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with azzolinaphotography.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review azzolinaphotography.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.