Skip to main content

Security report for azura.xyz

Eversify, Inc. · Finance · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Azura is a specialized DeFi trading platform and non-custodial wallet service operated by Eversify, Inc., targeting crypto traders and investors seeking advanced, omnichain decentralized finance asset management. The platform offers a robust application and interfacing layer that abstracts DeFi complexities, enabling faster, smarter, and transparent trading across multiple blockchains. Azura's market position is strengthened by its intent-based order execution engine, integration with major DeFi protocols, and backing from reputable investors and audit partners. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks like Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, with good performance and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS, 2FA, passkeys, and MEV-resistant execution rails, though some improvements are recommended such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing security.txt. Overall, Azura presents a professional and trustworthy platform with a strong focus on security and user control over assets.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching azura.xyz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Azura operates in the competitive DeFi space with a unique hybrid model combining a non-custodial wallet and a trading platform. Its business model relies on providing seamless access to decentralized protocols without custody of user funds, enhancing trust and security. Revenue streams likely include trading fees, API access, and partnerships such as with Moonpay for fiat on/off-ramping. The company targets sophisticated DeFi users and developers, supported by a strong ecosystem of backers and audit partners. Strategic partnerships with Turnkey and Moonpay enhance wallet security and payment capabilities. Growth indicators include recent seed funding announcements and expanding protocol integrations. The platform's omnichain approach and intent-based execution engine differentiate it from competitors, positioning Azura as an innovative player in decentralized finance.

Security posture

Azura demonstrates a mature security posture with multiple layers of protection including non-custodial wallet architecture, 2FA, passkeys, and MEV-resistant execution rails. The use of reputable audit partners adds credibility to its security claims. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of explicit security headers, and missing incident response contact information represent areas for improvement. The platform does not currently provide a security.txt file or detailed vulnerability disclosure policy, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, Azura's security practices are solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional industry best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Implement and display a cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to harden the web application.
  5. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eversify, Inc.
Description
Azura is a full-stack trading platform for DeFi assets, providing an application and interfacing layer that enables users to trade decentralized finance assets faster, smarter, transparently, and at scale. It offers omnichain, non-custodial wallet services and integrates with multiple DeFi protocols.
Key services
DeFi asset trading, Non-custodial wallet, Real-time market data, Order execution engine, API access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web Application, API
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Non-custodial wallet architecture
  • 2FA and passkey authentication
  • MEV-resistant execution rails
  • Use of audit partners

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Vercel Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional DeFi trading platform with non-custodial wallet features.
  2. Strong emphasis on security with 2FA, passkeys, and audit partners.
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  5. Multiple social media and community links present (X, Discord, Telegram).
  6. No security.txt or explicit incident response contact found.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain registered with Cloudflare, no DNSSEC enabled.
  8. Website uses modern web technologies and is hosted on Vercel.
  9. Content is well structured with FAQ and detailed feature descriptions.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, which supports fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. The use of Vercel Analytics indicates some level of user behavior tracking, though minimal. The site structure is clear with well-organized content and navigation. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The absence of DNSSEC and some security headers indicates minor technical debt in security configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and modern, supporting the business goals effectively, but with room for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with azura.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review azura.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.