Skip to main content

Security report for azgrad.lv

AZGrad, SIA · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AZGrad, SIA is a Latvian family-owned business specializing in energy efficiency services including building energy certification, energy audits, blower-door tests, thermal bridge calculations, moisture regime construction calculations, thermography, and 3D energy consumption simulations. Operating since 2013, the company serves building owners and construction professionals primarily within Latvia. The website reflects a niche market positioning with a focus on professional service delivery and compliance with local regulations. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, hCaptcha for form protection, and integrates Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika for user tracking with privacy considerations such as IP anonymization. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and spam protection, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is supported by a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, supporting the company's credibility in its sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching azgrad.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention azgrad.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for azgrad.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a specialized segment in the energy sector, focusing on energy certification and auditing services for buildings. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to both individual building owners and business clients. The presence of detailed pricing, contact forms, and physical address indicates transparency and customer accessibility. The use of social media and Google My Business links supports local marketing efforts. The company appears stable with over 10 years of operation, though domain age could not be verified due to WHOIS query limitations. The partnership with Zing for website development suggests collaboration with local digital service providers. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, and hCaptcha is used to mitigate spam and automated abuse on contact forms. Analytics tools are configured with IP anonymization to enhance privacy. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices suitable for a small business website.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security policy or incident response contact to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user and service terms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AZGrad, SIA
Registration number
40103636336
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AZGrad, SIA
Description
SIA "AZGrad" ir ģimenes uzņēmums ar lielu pieredzi energoefektivitātes jomā. Darbojamies no 2013. gada. Piedāvā ēku energosertifikātu izstrādi, energoauditus, blower-door testus, termisko tiltu aprēķinus, mitruma režīma konstrukciju aprēķinus un termogrāfiju.
Key services
Ēku energosertifikātu izstrāde, Energoauditi, Blower-door testi, Termisko tiltu aprēķini un simulācijas, Mitruma režīma konstrukciju aprēķini, Termogrāfija, 3D ēku energopatēriņa simulācijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, hCaptcha, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of hCaptcha on forms to prevent spam
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Business is a small Latvian family company specializing in energy efficiency services.
  4. Multiple contact methods and a privacy policy are present, indicating compliance awareness.
  5. Use of hCaptcha and HTTPS indicates attention to security and spam prevention.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Website uses modern analytics and tracking tools with IP anonymization.
  9. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mono CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and various Mono-specific scripts. It integrates hCaptcha for bot protection and uses Google Tag Manager to manage analytics scripts for Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with some deferred script loading and lazy loading of images. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. The technical implementation supports a professional and functional user experience with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with azgrad.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review azgrad.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.