Skip to main content

Security report for azblue.com

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona operates the website azblue.com, providing a comprehensive range of health insurance plans including individual, family, Medicare, Medicaid, and employer solutions. The company holds a strong market position in Arizona as a leading health insurance provider with a broad provider network. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and offers clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its diverse target audience including members, employers, brokers, and providers. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and uses Formstack for form management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness, though the absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching azblue.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on providing health insurance products tailored to various customer segments including individuals, families, Medicare beneficiaries, Medicaid recipients, and employers. Revenue streams likely derive from insurance premiums and related services. The company benefits from the strong Blue Cross Blue Shield brand, which enhances trust and market penetration. The website supports customer engagement through secure portals and 24/7 help resources. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers such as Formstack and Google for analytics and marketing. Growth indicators include the introduction of new health plans like Prosano Health Plans. Strategic observations suggest a focus on digital transformation and customer-centric service delivery.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, reducing risks of common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. Compliance with privacy regulations appears adequate with privacy and cookie policies present and consent mechanisms in place. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and providing direct security contact channels to enhance incident response capabilities and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information including security-specific email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by including data protection officer contact details if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
Description
Be your healthiest with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona. Find health insurance plans for all health concerns and budgets for individuals, families, and businesses.
Key services
Individual and family health insurance plans, Medicare Advantage and Supplement plans, Medicaid Health Choice plans, Employer health insurance solutions, Provider network services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Formstack, Google Fonts
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login portals
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Formstack
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and highly relevant to health insurance.
  3. Strong brand presence consistent with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage; login portals redirect to secure subdomains.
  5. Phone number (800) 232-2345 is prominently displayed as main contact.
  6. No email addresses found in the HTML content.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  9. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  10. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, which supports server-side rendering and improved performance. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Formstack indicates advanced analytics and form handling capabilities. The use of Sitecore CMS is inferred from media asset URLs, suggesting enterprise-grade content management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks are minimal but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with azblue.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review azblue.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.