Skip to main content

Security report for axios.com

Axios · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Axios is a prominent digital news media organization delivering smart, efficient news coverage across a broad range of topics including politics, business, technology, health, and climate. The website demonstrates a strong market position with a large audience and offers key services such as news articles, newsletters, Axios Pro subscription, and live events. Technically, Axios employs a modern web stack including Next.js and React, supported by robust analytics and advertising technologies. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and comprehensive security headers, though explicit security policy and incident response information are not publicly available. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Axios presents a professional, trustworthy, and high-quality digital news platform with extensive content and transparent advertising practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of axios.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching axios.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Axios operates as a large media entity focused on digital news delivery and subscription-based newsletters. Its competitive advantage lies in efficient, trustworthy news reporting and a strong digital presence supported by social media channels. Revenue streams likely include advertising, subscriptions, and event hosting. The target audience is broad, encompassing general news consumers interested in politics, business, and technology. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages partnerships with major advertising and analytics providers. Growth indicators include active content updates and diversified service offerings such as Axios Pro and Axios Live. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining privacy compliance and enhancing security transparency to sustain user trust.

Security posture

Axios exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, strong security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of privacy management tools indicates attention to regulatory compliance. However, the absence of a public security policy, vulnerability disclosure program, or incident response contacts suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is high but could be improved by publishing formal security documentation and providing clear channels for security incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on data retention and user privacy practices to strengthen compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Axios
Description
Smart, efficient news worthy of your time, attention, and trust. Covering local news, politics, health, climate, tech, media, business, sports, world, science and more.
Key services
News articles, Newsletters, Axios Pro subscription, Axios Live events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Segment Analytics, DoubleClick GPT Ads, Fides.js (privacy management)
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of privacy management script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Segment Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Segment Analytics, Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong presence of professional news articles with author attribution.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and terms policies available.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form only.
  8. Social media presence is extensive and consistent with brand.
  9. Advertising and tracking practices are transparent and use reputable providers.
Technical notes

Notes

Axios utilizes a modern and scalable technical infrastructure based on Next.js and React frameworks, enabling fast and responsive user experiences. The integration of Google Analytics, Segment, and Facebook SDK supports extensive data collection and marketing efforts. Advertising is managed through Google DoubleClick, ensuring monetization while maintaining transparency. The website is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility standards, with proper meta tags and SEO configurations. No significant technical debt or performance bottlenecks were observed. Opportunities exist to further enhance security documentation and incident response capabilities to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100 −3Medium23 findingsView report
  2. 63/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with axios.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review axios.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.