Skip to main content

Security report for avitarhotelriga.com

Avitar Hotel Riga · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avitar Hotel Riga appears to be a hospitality business with a domain registered since 2010. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure. However, the website content is poor and contains unrelated SEO keywords, which undermines its professionalism and trustworthiness. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information is provided, which raises concerns about compliance and user trust. Security posture is weak due to lack of security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking but requires significant improvements in content quality, security, and compliance to enhance its credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avitarhotelriga.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets the hospitality sector but lacks clear service descriptions and contact details, limiting its market positioning and customer engagement. The presence of unrelated SEO keywords suggests attempts to attract traffic through keyword stuffing rather than focused marketing. The business model and revenue streams are unclear from the website content. No partnerships or certifications are indicated, and the branding is inconsistent. The domain age supports legitimacy but the website content quality and transparency are low, which may impact growth and reputation.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL) but lacks visible security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, which weakens its defense against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no security contact channels are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices is a concern. The security score is low, and improvements are needed to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including email, phone, and physical address.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure standard security headers to improve security posture.
  4. Remove unrelated SEO keywords from metadata to improve content relevance and trust.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and provide security contact channels to enhance transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Avitar Hotel Riga
Description
The website appears to represent a hospitality business named Avitar Hotel Riga. However, the title and metadata include unrelated service keywords such as upholstery cleaning, sealcoating, tree service, and SEO services in various US locations, indicating possible SEO spam or keyword stuffing. No clear business description or services related to a hotel are found in the provided content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  4. Metadata title contains unrelated SEO keywords indicating possible spam.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. Domain is registered since 2010 and expires in 2025, showing long-term registration.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, content is accessible.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  9. No social media links or business contact information found.
  10. Website content quality and professionalism are poor with inconsistent branding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a popular CMS (WordPress) with a well-known theme (Divi) and SEO plugin (Yoast), indicating a standard technical stack. The site loads Google Fonts and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. However, the site lacks advanced security configurations and comprehensive privacy compliance features. The metadata is poorly managed with keyword stuffing, which may harm SEO effectiveness. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and requires modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avitarhotelriga.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avitarhotelriga.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.