Skip to main content

Security report for avinteractive.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.avinteractive.com operates as an AV industry media publication providing news and buyer guides focused on professional audio visual solutions. The content targets industry professionals seeking the latest updates and product information in the AV sector. The site is built on WordPress and employs common web technologies including Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy or recent registration status. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the site presents professional content but requires improvements in security, compliance, and business credibility to enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avinteractive.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention avinteractive.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
213
Employees
0
Customers
213
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for avinteractive.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model is media publishing focused on the AV industry, targeting professionals and buyers. The site likely generates revenue through advertising and affiliate marketing, as indicated by tracking pixels and ad network scripts. Market positioning appears niche within the AV technology sector, but lack of clear company information and domain registration details limits confidence in business scale and longevity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the data. The site maintains consistent branding and good content quality, supporting a positive user experience for its target audience.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic to moderate. HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. The site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, reducing readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the analysis, but the absence of security best practices and policies suggests room for improvement in security culture and governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection.
  3. Publish contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email for incident reporting.
  4. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
AV Magazine features all the latest audio visual news with focus on AV equipment & solutions for the industry professionals
Key services
AV news, buyer’s guide to pro AV solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. WHOIS data is missing indicating domain may be unregistered or recently registered
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found
  5. Website uses common tracking and analytics scripts
  6. Content is focused on AV industry news and buyer guides
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No visible security or incident response policies
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. Site appears to be a WordPress-based media publication
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with common plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It loads multiple external resources including Google Fonts and analytics/tracking scripts from Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google. The site appears mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed metrics available. Accessibility features are basic but present. The lack of security headers and incomplete compliance documentation indicate technical debt in security and privacy implementation. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a functional media site but requires modernization in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avinteractive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avinteractive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.